My student period in Iran is not the phenomenon of Sandys was not Bob and our Government from Sandys, safely and without fear of آبرویی, we have over. Cake and Sandys of the staples of our time was that some humor to it, "said amelh silencer". This silencer amelh are the days when we had classes or morning till night in Ramadan days are weird sat on. I comes eight years ago a seven day of the month of Ramadan, when lunch is one of the همینها I bought a fairly busy day retreats in one place was speculation. In the same situation with fairly among the gentleman just sort of came and asked except dont know that Ramadan is fasting should not be speculation? I said why I know but all don't think like him and some are not like my day. Said, but you have to respect my opinion بگزاری! I told you you should have with the logic of my opinion and so I respect بگزاری! He said the Islamic country here and most people are fasting, and when a large number are in my opinion after fasting is preferred. I said, to assume that it is the number one fans opinion opposed to it properly and does not believe it is wrong to prove. Say if you should you swing to democracy معتقدی day. I saw Perth and Pola says thmandeh cake and the front region of the ساندیسم I have down. In fact, I was so hungry that if cars came first time cities became accustomed way cake and gave the cities became accustomed after Sandys went Scouting.
Some people think that if they have something to believe in — Especially if religious geophysical. — Then the rest of the shelling, which believe they respect bgzarand, albeit that this belief is contrary to reason or contrary to the conscience and the other group liberties.. Some more tweaks to justify this to the Fake crowd Are resort. That is, rather than have the logical reasons why that is true; geophysical argue, they are correct and right with them because large numbers according to they believe. Some of this fake democracy with — That is basically a way of Government and personal freedom to communication does — Explain. To believe this group. democracy is that if most members of a group or community wanted a reduction should be the same thing because they are دموکراتی people and if you don't like them don't think someone دموکراتی (Of course, I'm sure this is just about the opposition and democracy if the front of their own children, and women from دمکوکراسی can be converted to velayat-e Faqih!) Such argument is correct, assuming there are many bands that have a population of more than the Muslims, but they are quite different and should respect the beliefs it *. For example, many people in India, with a population of more than one billion people, believe that the existing cattle moghaddasi and it must be an invocation *. With the assumption that the large number of supporters of a group, it shows correctly, Muslims should stop گوشتخواری to respect Indians and a cow worship Satan. Sunni Muslims, for example, or intolerance, — Of the 150,000 Shiites intolerance, our country is much more — Believe that the Shiites are unclean and kill them makes the killer go to heaven to be. Or, for example, most people in the world before the advent of Galileo and کپرنیکوس believed that the Sun around the Earth, and the Earth is the center of the universe and of course Galileo is to disagree with the common opinion price paid. Unfortunately this is not respect for beliefs such as *. I believe that the Shiite Holy cow or should cultivate or did not respect the Earth is the center of the universe, gzarm, but to the right-holders and the Shiite and patriotic day cattle owners to make a belief to the contrary, I believe you have to respect gzarm. In fact what is respected have the right to have personal and religious freedom and belief and their opinions do not necessarily respect. The rights and freedoms of individuals are respected and reliable defense of their freedom on the condition that; the point is that all the freedom of others begins..
Because no insults after thank you. Yes, it is a claim that it had the food from you Sir trying because “Should the opinions I respect alone” Illogical and unpredictable, and the absence of deference is. But there are those who would say “Not to wrong beliefs respect *” -Instead of the correct- And it means this result because we know that the belief نپسندیدیم
ShowAny defamation and lies and right mixed up and exaggerating and propagating hate about that opinion and the believers
Is permitted and should be based on those lies with a variety of kinds of insults and the opinion it broken down fhashaha *. Is this behavior (And justify it)On both sides of the religious or anti-religious you see.
An interesting reference to the subject کردین. I also a few years ago with the same subject, namely a 2008 article but it got released to the Kurdish language question. “Why let others ahaterm ideas?”
ShowIf I know how to be good Web بخونینش
The bottom of the second page “فۆچی رێز لە بڕوای خەڵک bgarm?
yndk.com/Archive/medya/2008/m352/m352-4-5.pdf
good luck
"The land of Israel to the Jews of the assignment document shshdang by Allah in the Qur'an to the hereafter»
1.- Do Muslims do not accept the words of Allah and say Allah is wrong?
2.- Whether it's a document that is in the Quran Allah is taken?
3.- Do Muslim clerics for warmongering and create another excuse for crisis work, stay together?
4.- Do they question their clergy should not be Muslims because they do not have to accept the letter?
5- Do you bring a few thousand years old history of Iranians friendship with the Jews are the enemy of the Jews and Israel in the direction of futile hostility with Iran and Iranians and Iranian national interests?
—————————————————————–
( Text of Quran chapter 17: الإسراء )
So [The Pharaoh] The decision, which took them from the land [Egypt] To provoke them so he and whoever was with him all we drowned (103)
فَأَرَادَ أَن يَسْتَفِزَّهُم مِّنَ الأَرْضِ فَأَغْرَقْنَاهُ وَمَن مَّعَهُ جَمِيعًا 103 ﴾ ﴿
And then he said the children of Israel in the land of the living when you promise everlasting life overtakes you all gather together mikanim (104)
وَقُلْنَا الأَرْضَ اسْكُنُواْ إِسْرَائِيلَ لِبَنِي بَعْدِهِ hear فَإِذَا جَاء وَعْدُ الآخِرَةِ جِئْنَا بِكُمْ لَفِيفًا 104 ﴾ ﴿
Show________________________________________________
"Ferdowsi Cyrus» [email protected]
Please reproduce this text on other sites, please.
My dear friend, I am of those who believe that an Iranian intervention in the Arab-Israeli dispute and Israel was wrong from the beginning. This issue goes beyond humanitarian activities does not have any communication to us. However, the argument you'll not do away settings. First the Koran or Bible or any other document is not land ownership-book. On the basis of the resolution of the year 1947 During the existence of the United Nations that Israel recognized half of historical lands of Palestine was entrusted to the Linda Eder and the other half to the Palestinian people. The lack of acceptance of the Convention means accepting Israel's existence is the lack of. Israel should adhere to the Treaty and did not remain until the 1967 That contract was signed between the two sides will share 30 percent Israelis Palestinians put the takeover and it was one of the remaining 20 percent to the Palestinians share that at the same time were housing and settlements.
Secondly, you astdlaltan two things that are different but, in fact, the meaning of the name are you like lump sum. To do so, say Equivocation in English. Ethnic origin in which two thousand years ago is the same as the name of the known Jewish Jews that today is known by this name. The Jews today European ancestors And purely Jewish mzhbshan. In the Quran and the Bible that God gave the children of Israel, Israel. While the open say what the Qur'an and Bible says nothing to do not have the rights of Nations. However, the children of Israel 3000 Years ago the same today or are they descendants of Israeli. That is why it will probably be at least a part of the Palestinian leader of Israel today is that the effect of the passage of time has changed دینشان.
ShowHindu cow نمیپرستند but also to the right to life of all living things azahmelh beef قایلند and they have to eat نمیکشند and they will reverence and not worshipped as زرتشتیها fire نمیپرشتند and reverence for the cow, they then tell presht to Hindu and Zoroastrian fire presht to ashtbahast you have to believe in God and if it's critical of Islam do not take into account the significant میتنوان of God God is believed but not Muslim.
ShowI seldom leave responses, however i did some searching
and wound up here Yo respeto su opinión no se sostiene |
Tarngar mañana. And I do have a few questions for you if it’s allright.
Could it be only me or does it look as if like a few of
the remarks appear like they are coming from brain dead visitors?
And, if you are posting at additional social sites, I’d
like to follow anything fresh you have to post.
Could you list of the complete urls of all your shared sites
Showlike your linkedin profile, Facebook page or twitter feed?