Feed
SSL
My YouTube
The Prophet of human ancestors, Hi fish.
Be sure you've heard this old riddle that had been the first chicken or egg? Solve this puzzle comes seems to be disappointed because if it was then the first chicken egg come from? And what if the first egg was laid eggs chicken instead of inventory? Despite the strange appearance of this riddle today we answer it know. The correct answer is none!
Generally, we plan these questions of chicken and eggs don't go beyond ourselves, beyond that, because we know that in the same position the chicken. But exactly the same question we ask ourselves about the time we can: The first human baby emerged or human parents? Because if it had been the first human baby so parents who were playing, and they came from where?
Religion generally, in these situations to help us solve the issue and very comfortable shtabad available: The Lord who created man from clay; then also threw out of heaven with the AHL and عیالش in the land of the living!
Richard Dawkins, the biologist and Professor Emeritus, University of Oxford, توضیج that why no human or personal as the first Prophet Adam there on the ground and also explains our original ancestors who were. Dawkins said the video to the Parsi brgerdandem with subtitles can On the site YouTube See the following links to download or. The rest of my videos on Tomorrow's films Division Are placed.
Download file
This documentary is accompanied by subtitles through This address Or of the Does no filtering (SSL ) The helpdesk.
A few tips that might help
- To watch the video file to a player with the ability to distribute my PDF file "Feb» need. If you do not have such a program, Who is my player program Good program (For Pocket computers) And offers that possibility to watch almost all of formet video gives you the.
- If the Internet download speed is low, you can use the Download Manager program like program "J Downloader» Use.
- If you are using the Windows operating system and then download the subtitle file, you see the letters in illegible; from within the Windows Control Panel, in the section Appearance and Personalization Click on the option Change date, time, or number formats Click the window Administrative The option Change system locale And then Persian Choose a time and turn on the device will fix this problem.
The reasons for 50 tons of the most prominent scientists in the world who do not believe in the existence of God or religion properly
Counterfeiting and falsification of the theory of evolution and Darwin about the existence of God
The first missionary and the first trickster
Does anyone hears our prayers
Why is traditional medicine is the science or scientific شیادی
Section: 
Tags: 
See the following video, I recommend to all. This documentary film is perfectly scientific (Not religious) From national geographic. The moral of this is to become a scientist does not need religion passed away.
youtu.be/rpibDIWKF5k
ShowFrancis Collins (The human genome project administrator) There is also a similar comment. He who is a Christian, faith is not in conflict with the theory of evolution he think:
asa3.org/ASA/PSCF/2003/PSCF9-03Collins.pdf
Dear friend, you might find a doctor that will take time, which means that a cigarette smoking is good or not so.
The evolution of human beings from other animals is conclusive. Today there is a mountain of scientific documentation that humans evolved from other animals came has the effect of. When you create the effect of the evolution of human existence has no meaning anymore, the first mutant; (mutation) In small batches and ultimately evolve within a small group of animals that formed were gone man.
Today the evolution of other even beyond the theory and Known as truth(From this person). Natural selection today The Foundation of modern biology And even though it does not deny the existence of God; the necessity of existence of intelligent designer to negate the whole.
On the other hand a belief that the name of the knowledge creation (creation science) Or the intelligent designer (intelligent designer) It was raised, the بکل of the circle of science and As science is science or Soddo To be known.
ShowThe question of God Dennett, philosopher Daniel even insecure belief, also confirms that some types of religiosity is not in conflict with evolution. منبع:
Science & Religion: Are They Compatible
Plantinga & Dennett
“True, at least some forms of theism are consistent with evolution”
http://skepticfreethought.com/libere/2012/12/19/review-of-plantinga-dennetts-science-religion-are-they-compatible/
ShowDear friend, if you claim that you now God called کاظمیتا in the center of the milky way black hole there; there is no way for science that unlike the show you said. Science is based on observation, experience and Falsifiability works. None of these things we cannot do inside the black hole Center of the Galaxy, but the meaning of this saying is not that God is called کاظمیتا in the center of the milky way there; it is essentially such a rational belief.
Yes, science can not deny the existence of some kind of religiosity, or claim that khlafsh has fixed because basically it is not in the realm of science, but because we consider it to be types of دیندای you find logical reasons to believe we need that do not exist.
Carl Sagan learn to live this well this issue has turned to a supernatural claim (extraordinary claim)–Like most what religion claims–To do that you need the supernatural documentation. Because the reason for accepting the claims at first Ned ردکردنشان اریم reason to do both.
The story of her personal link so (Francis Collins) A Christian is a اونجلیک. For readers who don't know what is اونجلیک or Christian evangelical Christian; to those who say that the truth of the contents of the Bible believe. For example, we all believe, unlike knowledge of geology and Zoology, the land of seven thousand years, and humans and dinosaurs live together in a time of crisis, because they believe in the Bible and the Gospel about the age of the Earth, they're interesting opinions, of course, and also about Islam.
If you want to matqdattan this way with the fixed name of people; I'm no objection even though This is fake. But remember it is often at about biologist scientists (95 The percentage of) And the most prominent American scientists (Members of the Academy of Sciences; approximately 93 The percentage of) Basically Don't believe the existence of God.
ShowThe purpose of this عرائض was no proof of the belief it is that you've picked up (And the verdict from the current time you fake this!). In order to remember this entry was that science and religion are two separate realms, and can together be compatible. As a result, if a natural person to a strange belief beyond your opinion, if you can't get it to رّد (Even though you cannot accept) You do not have the right to humiliate it.
ShowI did something I didn't humiliate. I merely claim that someone called Adam and there is also the issue of the way science is proved. This is a topic that does not exist, or the first man fully in the realm of science. That God (And not necessarily the religion) And the two have different realms of science told is properly. The existence of God cannot be proved from the path of science as we cannot deny the way science talks. But before you do accept the need for admission to mteghn reasons that exist. Unless you imagine other ways such as witnesses (intuition) There that I do not believe this issue but not in the sphere of science and wisdom.
Other comments about the report that leftist, Steven Hawking does not claim that it can prove there is no God; claims it can prove the existence of God is not a requirement. Hawking claims God is not the cause of this issue and first according to the necessity of the existence of God, he denies.
ShowSee the national geographic film, understand what I say when science and religion in this case do not contradict. Human existence is called Adam who is the current head of the dynasty of man, does not necessarily mean that the human creature before him (The facade) There is not another. Or that religious texts say man created from dirt to it does not mean that the man “Directly” The territory has been created.
In the meantime comments that Stephen Hawking as the events of the beginning of the افرینش proposes is not yet proven. In fact, not my theory from admission does not have enough evidence to. Therefore no result is philosophical (For example, in the case of “The necessity of” The existence of the creator) It was not possible. These are اتکأ to understanding with myself I don't w. Comment of physicist hawking itself is aligned:
Neil Turok
archive.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/02/qa_turok?currentPage=all
Roger Penrose
metacafe.com/watch/5278793/roger_penrose_debunks_stephen_hawkings_new_book_the_grand_design/
ft.com/cms/s/2/bdf3ae28-b6e9-11df-b3dd-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1XDd9DeOl
Michael Duff
Showyoutube.com/watch?v=nb7LCau_Z_Y
Hi… If the theory of evolution was correct must be Homo nowadays we see different animals with 10000 years ago and does not find evolution but through stories and very old PDF documents also do the same with the same forms and organisms, for example, 10000 years ago abdan were there and did not change at all.
ShowDear friend, there is no book or document that qdmetsh to reach ten thousand years. The whole history of the invention of the relevant line 3200 BC is.
You said that aside from this evolution or human evolution does not happen within ten thousand years. Ten thousand years is a very short time in order for a species to become another species. For example, we have هموسیپیسن or the current people in about two hundred thousand years we have. Our ancestors about five hundred thousand هایدلبرگس, battered in the years ago lived and HMV ارکتوس related to the approximately one million years ago or more were. About ten thousand years ago, with animals being animals had also said this difference today is incorrect. There are several species that are extinct from that time, such as mammoths, but whether such evolution is needed to find more time.
ShowThe first question was about the chicken or the egg
On the assumption of the existence of one of the first of them was because the chicken will need more of the eggs need to hatch chicken merghh
But in the case of the first man theory
If you got all the history of the evolution of the (That has been approved for animal perfectly still in the Quran and to the emphasis on discussion about a very human but is amazing) You see when you browse the man arrive to Baffin jfang a wholly-!
All lost items discovered the rings are very funny and are unbelievable! Always a chance a person has found something she had hit something or pie that the human skull has been ironically that was always been a side view!
Respected scientists, please respond to this question that the man exactly which branch of the monkeys got تکاملش taken?
Why are half man half the monkeys now?
Meanwhile, before modern humans certainly other humans that have been missing nslshan, but modern humans got someone could not get it fixed that one hundred percent of the monkeys are
In the meantime, scientists finally have the difference هوموساپینس and therefore not clear why the Neanderthal?
Question 3.: Scientists who so about the history of millions of years ago the comment so that it feels like they have been there because the answer is not that this question according to their own if that Meteor 65 million years ago to the rocky ground, and I emphasize all-all- The dinosaur during a short period of ruined so why today many animals small and they have changed?
Question 4. : Why I have stressed that all the birds evolved from a type of bird (At the time of the dinosaurs) But the same bird is immediately gone?
ShowOur dear friend do this discussion here that scientists were dyed or jfang noose or not so funny or not. We can only demonstrate that religion and science said what what is said. When the difference between the two of us knew and we understand that your claim is against a non-scientific and human knowledge; then you can say I don't accept the latter and I believe BMW. This is your right.
About svalattan is a buy and read biology books. Or a series Wikipedia articles CERT. I'm not a science teacher who is not supposed to be here and I prove evolution. I can only give you a scientific reference resources. Your question is like one person claims if the Earth is round because we do not بالایش افتیم. For a detailed explanation of this topic a couple of books it is necessary to ذقیقا what is gravity, and how and why the Earth is precisely what the spherical and flat but not my duty to explain this is not content. I can only give you a referral to a resource that is not flat and spherical Earth give. In fact, there are groups who claim the Earth is flat and the reasons for their Like this group. The book is published and the article also wrote that the Earth is flat.
ShowI have enough articles and books in the field of documentary film read. As well as the history of the discoveries scientists have worked on the development of the.
I have no time to wait until I see not what scientists can discover where کعلوم that one hundred years later we now نگویند wrong? Something that has been in the past is not repeatable and experience
Unfortunately, today's scientists are some of the work that they become the new religion science.
ShowIf the science is the most important thing in the world.
Other things like other science in the discretion of the human being, and human value far higher than all of them
I've seen enough documentary film article and books in this field read. As well as the history of the discoveries scientists have worked on the development of the.
If you are not a biology teacher then why defend anything?!
I have no time to wait until I see not what scientists can discover where کعلوم that one hundred years later we now نگویند wrong? Something that has been in the past is not repeatable and experience
Unfortunately, today's scientists are some of the work that they become the new religion science.
If the science is the most important thing in the world.
Other things like other science in the discretion of the human being, and human value far higher than all of them
In any case, dear friend you can either as a human being you have to ask that question of any
If you see the above question of دنشمندی he possesses something that I always got the answer ngraftm!
There is also more questions new “Scientists” The theory of human evolution Pro “Today” From monkeys to the margin rules
ShowMy dear friend from the scientific method to discover the facts contained in the material world, I will defend. If I were to write an explanation of human evolution here a comment I wrote myself that is not reliable because I'm not an expert in this field therefore should refer you to a reputable source should I pay. That's not to say I was going to prove something is.
We have to figure out how much each comment is valid must know what science is and how it works. Clearly, when we say a scientific theory is subject or beyond (Like the evolution of the) This is not a scientific principle, which means that one or more of the scientist is to. Create new discoveries that come in sections is not the reason for rejection of current discoveries. In addition to these new discoveries is not supposed to be a scientific question, such as the evolution of the principle of the throat. One hundred and fifty years of scientific evidence on the evolution of the mountain there is a confirmation. All our new knowledge on the basis of this theory is based on the. Whether you have a claim to future discoveries to bring the head and the bottom of the case, which means that this is not about performance or knowledge do something contrary to your interest or you know accept.
Show
ShowWhat this man said?!!!!!
ShowI said “The center of the cosmos is! Don't believe the meter now”
The Administrator of your life, some of the users are dry and myznn themselves to the Nafhami . These are the people who have learned the way of making a religion or have been brainwashed. . A fist of your brain to swallow that research about the world is a big sin .
Show