Akbar Hashemi زفسنجانی, reformist candidate in the elections, 92, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Ali Khamenei. The image of the Mehr News Agency.

The dispute between voting and 30 on the eve of the elections, sanctions are a high. Voting with the same way of the previous courses, argue, in the absence of that country is in poor condition, choose a moderate adjustment to the terms of the President and reduce the economic and political pressures can help. On the opposite side of a boycott of the election, believe that differs sharply from the Islamic Republic of — In addition to being political and being closed, and a few years with the last round of fraud and also to completely differs sharply from the blood and the price of a few hundred tons of people held in Iran — No minimum turnout is required for the participation in such elections so except that the Islamic regime's legitimacy is not achieved, another popular.

Both the voting and the boycott, believe that their view on the perspective of the opposite side is the preferred and current conditions of the country of the mkhalfshan front or not understood or are basically خاین and is mgharz. Both sides believe that a company or non-شرکشان is a great political action, which is a huge impact on the future of the country Cuba. These voters insist that vote to nominate their programmes, to the detriment of the rule of fashion is because opposing candidates to not win. Players also believe that the sanctions vote dadenshan in addition to being no disgrace involved, not to the system and the authority of the (Legitimate power) Offers, something that is lacking today. What all these pointless disputes, a repeat of their last years in hrbareh and chndbarh is. Voting in the various courses in the hope of changes to their candidates and voted for a boycott are in different periods of elections boycott and ultimately our country status update of the day is worse. Not voting to vote within a few decades, a significant change in terms of our homeland and not to boycott the elections managed node of the open country nodes. The election of the Islamic regime, a trivial phenomenon and in the best conditions to gain power among the mafia within the fights more resources, which is the company or the lack of it in the company of his men will not create any fundamental transformation. Ali al-Qaeda we can not hope that a similar behaviour under the present circumstances the same for years and decades, we repeat and get different results.

Hope for easy and effortless change through elections has an opiate function in Iranian society and prevents the formation of popular movements. The Iranian people prefer to make legitimate demands by shaping civil movements and public protests — that the logical way to make such demands — Wait for another election to happen once and for all, unaware that this formerly healed imamzadeh will not heal this time.. We all know very well how real change is shaped, even if we disagree on the surface, and even if we don't have the courage to tell the truth.. Political developments in Iran have no easy and shortcut solution. Unfortunately, the iranian nation's opportunities for change are lost one after the other, and history never waits for a losing nation..

Today, the Islamic Republic is at the beginning of the path that countries like North Korea went through many years ago, at the end of this path, there will be no such thing as an Iranian nation and something called Iranian civil society within the country that wants to make a difference.. It is better to think of a solution before we regret these days and the missed opportunities..