The vilification or freedom of expression on the Web are two English

In a piece about the difference Insult and accusation I wrote and it is necessary to write about the reasons for a short time arsalsh. As much as the emphasis on his charge that I brought the document correctly its not insulting.

A few weeks ago to urge a friend in one of the social networks I was a member of the English as I explain this to our friend the opportunity to do my current responsibilities both on the Internet and don't have a few years earlier that another person to join that website was sent an invitation, at the same time I was fired first, This was not our friend hand vector is not wrong to say there is a member, and must stand in front of the ایراندوستان ' parse number because the leave is low.

Ansafa is right this time, and was with him seems contrary to the predictions I have this account not just a few hours a few weeks that will life until yesterday were blocked and insulted me ID crime. While due to the closure of the اکانتم should be مسببین to send it – That also reminds me of the General ایراندوستان رودربایستی was rescued and did not have time to do things they do not provide me the – It is necessary to have a few سطری about it audits and داوریهای on the abdomen to write from those who apparently have داعیه freedom of expression.

A few years ago, after joining this site, I was expelled on the very first day simply because I had quoted a part of a 15th-century text verbatim. نقل کرده بودم:

There are no crueller and more audacious villains under the heavens than the Turks who spare no age or sex and mercilessly cut down young and old alike and pluck unripe fruit from the wombs of mothers”

Under the heavens, there are no people more vile and ruthless than the Turks, who know no age or gender in their cruelty, slaughtering young and old alike, and pulling fetuses from the wombs of women..

This post and my ID were removed as offensive language. Although the content is sourced and classical, besides that it could even be an opinion that another group does not agree with. به هر روی چنین نوشتجاتی را که در منابع متعدد دانشگاهی هم به آنها اشاره شده را نمی توان بی دلیل حذف کرد و دلیل حذف را هم فحاشی بنویسند آن هم زمانی که منبع نوشته همراه آن درج شده باشد. Of course, it must also be said that at that time, Persian websites had a much more sympathetic atmosphere towards Turkish separatists, and they published their insults and lies with greater ease..

Moreover, such quotes about the Turks are not strange for those who are familiar with history. The Turks are famous in the matter of savagery. One of the meanings of the word "Turk" in European languages, including English, is "savage" and "vile." (شماره هشت از این واژه نامه). حتی ولتر با تمام نجابتش says about these people::

I hate calumny so much that I do not want even to impute foolishness to the Turks, although I detest them as tyrants over women and enemies of the arts.

I hate infamy so much that I am not even willing to attribute foolishness to the Turks. (I am not even willing to associate the infamy of the Turks) Although I hate them as enemies of art and oppressors of women.

Rumi also considers these people a group created for destruction.:

"When the Holy and Exalted God created the world of dominion... He created the group of Turks so that they would mercilessly and without compassion destroy and demolish every building they saw."

In any case, by bad luck, we have also fallen in with a group of these people who, although they may not have Turkish ancestry, are intensely anti-culture and their existence is a great calamity for the life of Iranian society.. One of their habits is to attribute their own characteristics to others.. For example, a person named Hossein Feizollahi attributes sodomy to Cyrus the Great, and his absurdities have been repeatedly published by other Turks.. از جمله منابع این فیض الهی ها هم کسانی چون Gheyas Reza Moradi Abadi Is(بخش منابع این مقاله).

Incidentally, this claim by the Turks is very consistent with their own background.. Nevertheless, just as I welcome their right (and also their new friends' right) to bring logical evidence (از متون دانشگاهی) to prove their claim, we also reserve the right to write our reasons in this or similar cases..

در واقع لواط و همجنسگرایی در میان این مردم آن اندازه رایج بوده که می توان موارد متعدد، اسناد غیر قابل انکاری از سنتهای آن ذکر کرد. یک مورد بسیار مشهور از اسناد تاریخی، سفرنامه ابن فضلان است که درباره عادات مردم ترک توضیحات جالبی داده و درغرب هم تصحیح و منتشر شده. I will probably write a detailed article in the future with multiple sources on this topic that will remain on the Persian web for future references. But for now, just as in this book which is written by a professor at the University of Leeds است، اشاره شده: The debauchery of men and pederasty among the Turks, like the Arabs, is an inherent issue. This is something that many may not agree with. But quoting writings verbatim from an expert with their original source is called academic citation.. چنین مطالبی را – Even if we disagree – One cannot arbitrarily delete it, label it as obscenity, and then boast about freedom of speech..

Duchesne has a section in this book on ‘Sodomie ou prostitution mâle‘, pp.35–55, که در آن این اعمال دیده می شدinherent in the ‘Arabs’ and ‘Turks