BBC. Image in the public realm.

According to documents published Wikileaks site The Government of England, along with u.s. intelligence agencies, Israel, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and even the curator is supporting separatism in Iran (This entry To see all the manabash.). According to the CIA's diplomatic lomond you in addition to the direct support, spending millions of dollars, in the name of human rights and human rights organizations do; so it shouldn't be surprising to know much of those active as a human rights activist and supporter of the rights of ethnic minorities to their own wormholes; where are financing.

The last few years is that the country's State organs, the BBC uk, a part with the name of "observers say has created a Web site in English and some of the well known ' pen in it?. Despite being a BBC Persian tv I do not have access, but the most shamelessly the most ugly and anti-Iranian on the same content a few years of the BBC Persian website I read. Work somewhere that even Iran's legal basis for the hands and feet; while the right is called the right of secession in the form of self-determination is an absolutely shameless lie. The continuation of this policy led to a separate part of my blog henceforward I created to pay these fakes and thmetha posts.

The BBC claims that responsibility for others ' entries in your website that this claim is wrong. Because the BBC is also the author of the entry and selects the subjects responsible for the release of this is. Up today several times comment respectfully I also deleted comments from this section that the two examples that I had the opportunity earlier release will published. The main thematic content of all this in the name of national oppression ".. . As I explained earlier; maybe none of these articles alone does not matter, but the procedures that this fall in total content; Finally, the illusion-inducing to the reader that in Iran there is a Gulf in the name of ethnic people to various forms of economic, social, cultural, historical, and z Animation, foll violated the rights of other ethnic groups. Because of functioning and how the media influence like the BBC we should to some extent; with aware how political advertising and modern media have familiar پروپگاندای.

In Recent entry That an author has published the name of witness qumgra Alavi, a claim : 1) Separatism in Iran is an illusion. 2) The historical claims of being Iranian in English as the common language is meaningless because it can't issue before have contemporary conceptual. 3) A group of very extreme Pan-Aryan-oriented ایرانیست and generally opposed any kind of opening lends the whole cultural languages are غیرفارسی in Iran and it is opposed to Iran materials and their evaluation against the Persian language. 4) Separation of interests in Chicago, And not independence, In the face of democratic political space, freedom, cultural, linguistic and political power building renovated to guarantee federal and decentralized/unconditionally and the right of everyone to participate at all levels of the political game, color bazd.

If the secession in Iran was an illusion, according to u.s. Government documents–That was disclosed officially becomes even–And the media reports such as the telegraph or the States millions of dollars in lomond, Iran did not cost to devote to extend the illusion. If the British Government had some illusion to expand ethnic hatred was not a proposition. Of course the final row in his written Alavi this issue better clear. In fact, according to Alawi and Alavi in Iran there is no separatism because they want the country to shreds, they are not seeking independence, but security analysis;.

In this post also claimed that the English language has never been the common language of the Iranian people because those are the historical concept of the claim being does not know the language and the common language of the modern national State before basically is meaningless! It is not known the common language of dialogue before the modern era has no sense because what? Modern Governments that emerged in the middle ages eighteen and nineteen, and concepts such as the common language to what nationality with the hundreds and thousands of years of history? Unlike the authors of the BBC, Professor Arnold j. Toynbee, a prominent English linguist, believes that the Persian language Common language has been always Iranians.

In addition, the BBC Persian website to bash her extreme charge is ایرانیستها Pan; without being given an opportunity to this group that defend themselves. This behavior is not only unethical and unprofessional, but we also can be considered as. Pan did not believe that never ایرانیستها non-English languages need to be banned in Iran. Learning any new language, a new window is a growing global. Any language, any size and still be suffering, which, surprise, and other languages that are not in ظرافتهایی. Of these non-English languages as the teaching, the State fee, must not only be achieved but for the relatives of the remaining Iranians should be able to learn in the common languages of Iran. This topic is not only wrong, it is not less that someone with the opposite; what with which we are highly related, mandatory training an Iranian language, weaken the common language as a historical heritage of all Iranian peoples and not just a nation of (About Fars/PARS and the concept of community This is a good article To read.) And declining native language string to create ethnic hatred.

Discuss with fellow Iranian tribes of the beautiful love. Today that our nation has historically oppressed; the release of all Iranians mullahs regime of any ethnic origin depends on our cooperation and the release of all the people of Iran. In Iran, every Iranian is free tomorrow–As a citizen of Iran (And not as a citizen of a nation and tribe)–Human rights and citizenship that must be استیفا regardless of ethnic affiliations. The Islamic Republic of Iran to the people of all the oppression, but this was more in the right ajhaf some groups; however should not forget that the main problem is the tyranny of the Iranian nation and not who or LOR or azari is.

Some alien countries to pressure the Islamic regime and the Iranian blackmail risk analysis procurement saw حرکتهای. This issue will not lead to the collapse of Iran but can be ethnic and tribal wars and ethnic hatred in Iran; something that Iran does not have a history of today. Not difficult to understand that if the UK Government and its State-run media concern protection of ethnic rights; could this affection in Irish and Scottish decent right and not being in the worst economic conditions today are millions pound to the cost of their English broadcasts.

I love the text that the BBC did not publish, and censorship:

This set of notes will definitely represent the position of the BBC Persian. You yourself choose the sure-fire starter and the article you publish yourself so it certainly is against what you have responsibility, published.

Applicable as much to the "extreme ایرانیست" pan is not joanmardane (Because this group has the right to defend himself against the charges against the author of the article.) And not ژورنالیستی and professional. In addition, this group is a very "extreme" version of the doctrinal source for it yet to say this superficial man fallacy. The author herself decides who will have faith then what opinion the review.

This section is false if نگویم is false: «…Being natural selection in English as the common language of all Iranians…This is a non-historical understanding of why that common language before speaking of the formation of modern national State is dedicated to the contemporary world and in Iran less than a hundred years, is essentially meaningless and overcome historical times on the complication arises from the mind of the complainant.

برای مثال اینجا از پروفسور آرنولد توینبی:

Arnold J. Toynbee, A Study of History,V, pp. 514-15

In the Iranic world, before it began to succumb to the process of Westernization, the New Persian language, which had been fashioned into literary form in mighty works of art…gained a currency as a lingua franca; and at its widest, about the turn of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries of the Christian Era, its range in this role extended, without a break, across the face of South-Eastern Europe and South-Western Asia from the Ottoman pashalyq of Buda, which had been erected out of the wreckage of the Western Christian Kingdom of Hungary after the Ottoman victory at Mohacz

Translate: In the world of Persia, before فرآینده غربگرایی, new Persian language (Persian language in order of Islam.) That was common in the works of brjesh art as a common language [The Persians] Vogue website.

The English section of the library you can search Google.

Send this comment while but until today many respectable comments from me on this website have been removed. If this is deleted it will send a few comments for the highest. But I hope at least the principles of freedom of expression are not to be believed or if it might be find the belief.