BBC English.

According to documents published Wikileaks site The Government of England, along with u.s. intelligence agencies, Israel, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and even the curator is supporting separatism in Iran (This entry To see all the manabash.). According to the CIA's diplomatic lomond you in addition to the direct support, spending millions of dollars, in the name of human rights and human rights organizations do; so it shouldn't be surprising to know much of those active as a human rights activist and supporter of the rights of ethnic minorities to their own wormholes; where are financing.

The last few years is that the country's State organs, the BBC uk, a part with the name of "observers say has created a Web site in English and some of the well known ' pen in it?. Despite being a BBC Persian tv I do not have access, but the most shamelessly the most ugly and anti-Iranian on the same content a few years of the BBC Persian website I read. Work somewhere that even Iran's legal basis for the hands and feet; while the right is called the right of secession in the form of self-determination is an absolutely shameless lie. The continuation of this policy led to a separate part of my blog henceforward I created to pay these fakes and thmetha posts.

A few months ago the BBC story Be released With the title: «”پرژیا” Where is it and “پرژین” The cyst?. In it the author was trying to show the use of the title of Persia for all Iranian people, Iranian peoples in the right ajhaf. As I explained in the previous article, the main theme of all thematic articles قومگرایانه the BBC called the national oppression and the claims of the hand on the same connection can be raised. At that time I was in a fairly detailed answer two comments for the author wrote that the BBC will make sure both the censorship. Today that after a few months, I published another story response; these two comments, I will also publish. In addition, the article of Professor FRY in Harvard University–The answer to this is gossip pounding–J-stor database I received from Is available here Is. My comment text:

If a PARS and two Persian words is the same. The word "fares" or the Arabic form of the merb "PARS". Persian and Parsi is a relative adjective for people who speak English language (Relative adjectives like that for Iranian languages گویشگران.) "The group is English گویشگران or say Corp. Contrary to the opinion of the author, "the word like or Corp after Islam's historical usage and its use is not racist, nor is forging a new system. Sample: Fars field day bhan "I love/love/Avon/to/in/out/receipt after the Sarai curtain that unveils نوائی heard. (Jami, a seven-o.)

In the case of the difference of Persia/Iran and پرژیا, according to Richard Frye, the two words are not synonymous to historically. Iran is a country that stretches from the Euphrates to khwarezm and Khorasan is — The same thing today, "greater Iran" read. The western part of the historical land of Persia Iran merely name, i.e. what we read today in Iran or the Iranian modern country.

Persia would be used for the modern state, more or less equivalent to “western Iran”. I use the term “Greater Iran” to mean what I suspect most Classicists and ancient historians really mean by their use of Persia – that which was within the political boundaries of States ruled by Iranians.

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/1508723

از نظر قومی و اتنیکی به تمام مردم ساکن در ایران امروزی پارسیان می گفتند:

The Leks form the clans of genuine Persian blood, such as the Loors, Bekhtiaris. To them might be added the Koords, as members of the Persian family; but their numbers in the dominions of the Shah are comparatively few, the greater part of that widely-spread people being attached to Turkey. Collectively the Koords are so numerous that they might be regarded as a nation divided into distinct tribes. Who are the Leks, and who are the Koords? This inquiry I cannot solve. I never met anyone in Persia, either eel or moolla, who could give the least elucidation of this question. All they could say was, that both these races were Foors e kadeem,-old Persians.A Lek will- admit that a Koord, like himself, is an “old Persian”(Foors-e-Qadim) but he denies that the families are identical, and a Koord views the question in the same light.

Shiel, Lady (Mary). Glimpses of Life and Manners in Persia. London: John Murray, 1856.

نام تاریخی اقوام کرد، لر یا لک پارسی است. Even the people of Azerbaijan are also getting their mouths before Turkish In the fifteen century The Pahlavi language, and is also the name of the historical Group Corp. I recommend the author's friend This entry Read.

But why use ایرانین instead of/utube pergen though, there may be some you do for political reasons; I personally if non-Iranian dialogue with a person, the name of the country of Iran, and nationality/ethnicity I introduced myself pergen. Iranian trait in spite of historical background and despite being at least a thousand years or more in the new Persian language dating, European languages is not known and not a dating back to the turn of the century. Clearly, whatever about our backgrounds and دستاوردهایمان, in memory of the historic Nations and registered on ادبیاتشان, with the same title pergen come and use as more precise coordinates of possibly pergen cultural and historical identity of European languages in our offers. Another reason for me to not use pergen.