The book burnings, the Arabs in Iran.
Your question in the message below in this post the answer I gave

farda.us/?p=1121

The book burnings, the Arabs in Iran.
Hello dear friend, it seems you've edited the article to wiki? If you want something from somewhere to write quote quotes identically is not your personal opinion

In the case of rsantal he is a Professor of Hebrew and Semitic languages and specialist is an expert in not on. The fact that you told him did not show that this story was a copy of the library of Alexandria, as Bernard Lewis wrote the exact opposite of what you said about the Library of Alexandria, which is from your own reference..

Because the Muqaddimah of Ibn Khaldun on alabr or less credit is our nonsense and Morteza motahhari clerical professional we are not serious. «Introduction» Ibn Khaldun's work is the most important and known to it and open the English translation introduction that you yourself come page 373

tinyurl.com/3bz6bjb

When the Muslims conquered Persia and came upon an indescribably large number of books and scientific papers, Sa’d b. Abi Waqqas wrote to ‘Umar b. al-Khattab’, asking him for permission to take them and distribute them as booty among the Muslims. On that occasion, ‘Umar wrote him: ‘Threw them into the water. If what they contain is right guidance, God has given us better guidance. If it is error, God has protected us against it.’ Thus, the (Muslims) threw them into the water or into the fire, and the science of the Persians were lost and did not reach us

The English translation: "When the Muslims conquered Iran and inaccessible to a number of scientific books and pamphlets upon descriptive; Saad bin Abi oghas in the life of Ben addressed this request will allow books to be split among the Muslims as war booty; at the time, Omar replied: They بیانداز into the water; if what is in them is God to us correctly guidelines the guidelines sent to the better and if our God is false since they saved. So the Muslim books to water or fire evacuation and Iranian knowledge of vanished and we completed»

Alexandria Library about material that is irrelevant to the entire leftist because we talk کتابسوزی in Iran is not that of a سطری of Alexandria unless Bernard Louise about the similarity of these two stories have raised:
«The 14th century historian Ibn Khaldun tells an almost identical story concerning the destruction of a library in Persia, also by order of the Caliph ‘Umar, thus demonstrating its folkloric character »

که می گوید چون این نقل(آتش سوزی کتابخانه اسکندریه) Ibn Khaldun's written about Iran resembles کتابسوزیهای therefore, a feature on the folk show.

Even in the case of the Alexandrian Library Lewis proves nothing, he merely tries to refute the question of the Library of Alexandria, but he absolutely does not prove that the Arab sources on which he wrote about it are invalid or that it is completely incorrect, yet I agree that Bernard Lewis's view of Alexandria as an expert on the subject should be taken into account..

The last entry whether Iran accept libraries کتابسوزی نپذیریم what is no doubt the Arab attack on the effectiveness of many valuable works of Iranians vanished and we will lose a large part of میراثمان did. This issue is a denial of ناپدیر and alternately repeated in time to be Arabs or Muslims; on arrival to the economic aspects of the conquest of Iran, and Iran is not the slightest hesitation. Similarly there is no question that today all of us or a large part of the Iranian population are Muslims and the Muslim during the fourteen centuries of our inherent part of national identity to deny or change it in a way that does not exist according to this false and vain defense of the topics that is basically Rather than defend the position of Islam and Muslims is also does not help create more sensitivity and we have good and bad aspects of the arrival of Islam to Iran we will no doubt have positive reviews is because if this section set aside today the greater part of the tmdnaman after Islam Goes through

The book burnings, the Arabs in Iran.
"We don't have a problem with Islam being" a very general rule, and as such the totality and عمومیتی that you said certainly cannot be true Islam is a common concept and is not the same that we want مشکلتمان in analogy with the Muslim Shiite groups because even sensing and سلفیها with each other, for example, or the age the problem And all of your time as a true Muslim can read but if you get that this is the main problem we have is not people's beliefs to some extent this can be said to be true in my opinion, the biggest problem the Iranian community after Islam and Islamic clergy, even before the device is of course this property at all Societies of Mesopotamia to ancient Egypt to Christian Europe and the … Whenever a shared spirituality in society, corruption has taken the power of the community, and this is not merely a certain ritual contact with the

The BBC's response to the Iranian people is race;
Dear friend you can say Perth and Pola. You can expect the Lockman and others also benefit from this knowledge لایزالت. You thought I was a couple of times this week take nonsense? Sumerian language in terms of a group of isolated, are valid in any University in the world, this group's ancestors of the Turks or no other ethnic group are not considered. http://azargoshnasp.net/recent_history/pan_turkist_philosophy/sumd/buqalamoonsumeri.htm

In the case of my three posts on this blog Aryan wrote does not need to explain more. If someone wants to learn what can be written to look for sources if someone will have something to learn from me not working. The race also A social system And the base is not genetic. Something called the European race or don't race, Aryan race.. Why is there the same apparent features a detailed explanation of the needs that I wrote a post later maybe but something called race for the modern man does not have the application categories. In the case of the BBC also denied entry to nkhstshan themselves, and the second entry is the same as my written claim confirmed means that Iranians are survivors of the آریاییان living in Plateau. You will not post the rational نخواندی and after.

Rafsanjani: The decomposition of Azerbaijan and Baluchistan after the elections
1)Those who have today called Sadat know it have nothing to do with the Arab-Arabian peninsula. Even other bands today termed Arab like Iraq or Lebanon except the line and people with Arabs than do other. 2)Sidi in Iran is a full business income was and still is. Many in the past century claim their next generations and Sidi Sayed were called. Only twenty million SM there is in India that they are descendants of Ali. 3)There is something called the Aryan race or there is Arab. From the tags on the label of the Aryan race, and a few items that I see in that story I wrote. 4)Mossadegh was leaving Ghajar but ajdadsh Lor ashtiani were. The Qajar tribe is though a Turkish tribe, but it was with the size of the Iranian groups overhear that cannot be it a group called in Turkish. About the arrival of the Mughals and other guys so its shape size in other groups were مستحیل, which today is a sign of them not found.

The Charter of Cyrus and the adventure of stealing gheyas Reza Moradi Abadi
Wherever the source written story also come with. Bounce like General gheyas Abadi likes exaggeration of the problem does not solve. In this post story claimed his newspaper Hamshahri does come together. In the remaining cases it is referred to whenever the alleged gheyas Abadi have been or Be sure the source entries His time has come. If any of you own what's objectionable content and what his friends can be wrong because it's written below it and the room and be sure to be released.
Historical resources related to centuries ago in the hands of the likes of gheyas settlements does not value. Gheyas Abadi is a specialist on the owner of the ریویو several articles and books not academic. It merely can be properly cited recent academic texts to show ادعاهایش. If somewhere in this website in violation of the recent scientific texts to write a story was sure to be released.

Errors in the صدیقین argument Avicenna proving the existence of God
Hello dear friend,
Thank khobtan comments. I think you have two things that are similar to the name of each place you. In English to you Equivocation Say. A collection of facts meant to total (A gathering of) Not numbers. For example, the set of prime numbers or numbers are numbers contain numbers for couples with specific characteristics, but they are not a number. It may be a collection of the properties of its components do not have or do not own the properties of the components but not necessarily. The example in this context is not limited only to the collection of numbers. For example, the major part of my body is composed of water and you. But this does not mean that we have, for example, the properties of water in one hundred degrees Celsius to steam or zero degrees go on ice or wet if we sat down there somewhere. This entry is mainly there that was next to the philosophers Avicenna groups. As I wrote this for my high transition errors from Munich University of philosophy is a podcast and is accessible from here to London کینگزکاج. Be victorious.
historyofphilosophy.net/avicenna-god

Jewish billionaire: The atomic bombing Iran
No I do not shut down. Mercy of the pain and the heart.