Courtesy of dog-friendly

Ghiasabadi:

Cyrus in the third to nineteenth lines of the Charter claims that the people of Babylon do not want to go to Babylon. (King of Babylon) They were discontented, and considered him a king who had brought sorrow, hardship of livelihood, suffering, and death to his people.. Cyrus says that the people of Babylon asked the Great God to find a good king for them, and the great God found Cyrus and supported him to become king of Babylon, after he had searched the world.. Then all the people rejoiced in the kingdom of Cyrus, who was true and just, and who saved them from sorrow and death..

In paragraph 16, Darius reports from the first column of the Inscription of Bisotun that a person named Nedin Tobel, who introduced himself as the son of Nebonid, rose up and became king of Babylon with the support of all the people.. A few months later, in Ward 14 of the Third Column, Darius reports again that another person, Argha, who introduced himself as a son, rose up and became king of Babylon with the support of all the people.. Both uprisings were suppressed by Darius.

Now the question is, how is the contradiction between Cyrus and Darius' reports resolved? If people are unhappy and want to be Cyrus, how can two people not be found by claiming their own attribution to them? (That Ali al-Qaeda must be hated)Gaining such popular popularity and gaining a king.. Nineteen years later, many of the people of Babylon remembered the Kingdom of Nbvnyd and the Cyrus Kingdom.. اگر سخن داریوش درست باشد، نشان می‌دهد که نبونید به اندازه‌ای محبوبیت داشته که کسانی برای کسب حمایت مردم، خود را پسر او معرفی می‌کرده‌اند.

The Gospel of the Covenant concludes this way.:

The answer to this contradiction can be solved in three ways.: 1.- He has made a false claim to justify his attack on Babylon.. 2.- The Psalmist says that they are not the ones who are the ones who are not. 3.- Both are right.. The people of Babylon were really unhappy with Nabonid, but after gaining the experience of the government and Cyrus' behavior, they realize that he was better and more tolerable than he and the other Achaemenids, despite all his flaws.. The king of his descendants preferred him over the Achaemenids.. I don't think the fourth answer to this contradiction seems to me..

Ghias Abadi argues that because Cyrus has said that people were unhappy and Darius elsewhere has stated that someone has risen up claiming to be affiliated with Nebonid, so inevitably there is a contradiction between Cyrus' claim that he is not unpopular, and Darius who speaks of rebellion of someone or those with his name, and he offers solutions to this contradiction..

A brief introduction to the history of Iran or the world is enough to know that the reign of the old kings is not necessarily based on their popularity or unpopularity.. The kings were given the right of kings by descent or by association with the previous kings, and they were accepted into kings.. In some societies such as Egypt, kings descended from Gods, in societies such as ancient Persia, Farra had a Yazidi, and in Mesopotamia represented the gods, in any case, those who deserved to be kings of the descendants of kings were descendants of kings.. Even if a new dynasty came to power, it would somehow try to connect itself with the old kings.. The claim that the declaration of dependence on Nabonid indicates his popularity or Cyrus' oppression during his reign, is like claiming that the Iranian people loved Mohammad Ali Shah Qajar so much that after his expulsion, they chose his son Ahmad Shah to be king or Nader Shah was the friend of Shah Tahmasp II, who after the fall of his son to the throne or Shirviyeh, son of Khosrow Parviz, because of his father's popularity to the throne. Receipt. In none of these cases, the popularity of the former king is not the cause of his son's kingdom, but the attribution to the royal family and the blood of the king who makes him worthy of kingship.. In connection with the fact that someone has rebelled with his name does not necessarily indicate his popularity, and this argument is necessarily false..

Mr. Ghiasabadi has recently made other claims, including:

1- There is ample evidence of violence, looting, and the femininity of Cyrus the Great, which is associated with the rape of countries, the destruction of civilizations, the trafficking of slaves and the sexual exploitation of innocent girls..

2- Koreshi, which is formed by the initial inductions of British colonists and secondary induction of Cyrus sellers in the minds of some people, such as a fake imamzadeh, is only in the realm of dreaming, self-deception and demagoguery and has no relation to the real Cyrus.

3- This colonial program is designed to exploit and sacrifice the Iranian youth for the purposes of the colonists and to dislodge him from well to well.. Because they know that the Iranian youth can no longer be sent to war with old tricks and according to religion and gave him the club.. Future wars will be shaped by Aryan and Turkic and Arab conflicts, and the divisive and hateful programs between the Iranian people and the people of the region will be carried out in order to lay the groundwork for this purpose..

4- Colonialism is not always associated with colonialism.. It is sometimes used as a destructive ingredient to alleviate pain, disabilities and ineptitudes. Similar to what some people expect from the Forefathers..

5- Those who wear the Cyrus stone on their breasts, despite the invitation of the author and according to his constant objections and slanders, could not introduce a single historical source contrary to what the author had written.. They were not able to find the sources that the author had asked for and kept silent..

6- They will not hesitate to speak to them and they will not be able to do so without doubt.. But when they hear a disagreement, they do not hesitate to hesitate in their sources.. They see sources as biased, invalid, antagonistic, wrong in translation, distortions in the text, and so on, and use all kinds of latitudes and tricks to keep their heads or their disciples' heads under the snow for a while longer..

7- The Gospel of Prophecy is a great source of truth to be revealed. (and sometimes even revealing his real name.) They are afraid of the truth, and they will answer every question, and they will be questioned by the Witnesses.. During this time, they were able to organize fake Facebook pages, fake content, and swearing at the author on their own sites and blogs.. The fear of revealing the facts is either from those who see their downstairs shop on the verge of being closed down or by those who consider enlightened words "the drinking water of the present.".

8- Regardless, the author believes that pride in the past and learning from history is only possible with regard to true facts.. The honors of Iran's culture and civilization are more than the need to distort the facts.. Those who are in love with the walls of our ancestral village, or those who turn the walls of our village white out of unwarranted fascination, are not servants of the homeland.. The walls of our ancestors' memories are not as lovely as they are.. with the same half-walled walls, the same dried and fresh budding trees, the same streets full of flowers, the same goats smelling of turd, and the same scent of rained thatch, the sweetest smell in the world.

This gossip is not the smallest of the Arabs Reza Moradi Ghiasabadi I write these lines simply because the Ghiasabadi Nonsense is published on the Internet with the name of expert expert expert in history who actually has no expertise. The Psalmist says, "Blessed is the Lord of hosts, and of all things that are in the heavens and the earth, and the things that are in the heavens and the earth, and the things that are in the heavens and the earth, and the things that are in the heavens and the earth.". But criticism is different from nonsense and lying, and history has methods like other sciences..

For those who may not be aware, I write only to the extent that the writings of Herodotus or Plutarch, or the translation of Assyrian and Sumerian inscriptions, or the ancient histories that are first hand sources, are worth more than his Ph.D. degree in astronomy and are worth only when they come out of a prestigious academic authority.. Mr. Ghiasabadi, if he claims any of the above cases, should quote a full professor at a prestigious university in recent times to confirm each of his claims. .(Like those who had added to Cyrus' charter article) Or he can write an article on each of the above and publish it in a specialized journal and ask a few professors to endorse his article.. The era of foreign conspiracy theory is over; Mr. Ghiasabadi knows very well that none of his claims have scientific value, but he also knows that the general public does not know them..

The Psalmist speaks of you as a Savior. In A separate post. I reply..