Mousavi today and the years away.

Here are a few items that I read recently; whether we should continue with the illegal imprisonment of opposition Mousavi? Do we have those golden doransh Khomeini and nothing ندیدیم; we are a group that do not believe in the principle of the Islamic system and fara and illusion are the reform of the reform leaders of Defense موظفیم;? When rumors of the Mahdi — The person who says to the principle of the system is — Illegal detention and irrational behavior for invitation to Mohamed Akbar Hashemi hunger strike issue — That last is a defenseless prisoner provided both pretext for being perhaps the most haqughsh to the price he achieve initial — For the purposes of advertising group turns to jokes; we have to disagree with this illegal imprisonment or false rumors and to act in keeping with the Islamic regime to build her own jokes and پیوندش to the highest prayer for? If hypothetically with Mehdi MalekiIs it a pan-Iranian prisoner who was illegally detained last night, we have a professional dispute or disagreement, are we still obliged to defend his rights, or does our dispute downplay the issue of his and his likes' illegal detention?

35 Last year, when the Islamic Revolution was won in Iran, a group of political and military prisoners were executed in Iran.. Most of these people were put to death squads without due process and disproportionate to their crimes.. In some cases, even these individuals were not sentenced to death and were killed.. Among them were a large number of military officers and officers who were executed or sentenced to punishments disproportionate to their crimes and charges.. These massive and weakening efforts by the Iranian military later led to foreign military abuses and attacks and eight years of war, and cost Iran a heavy time to date.. Unfortunately, at that time, neither ordinary people nor political groups — Mainly leftists and Islamist leftists — They did not react to these punishments as they should, and this failure to respond to a very wrong act of the regime led to the same leftists and mujahideen 10 years later. — As the main factors in the formation of the Islamic Revolution — go and execute a large number of them. In the 1980s, when most political groups had become tinsel and qom, and society became highly religious, the current informationist figures were now. — that were part of the body at the time — They were among the few groups that could criticize, and they did not object to the unfair executions of leftists so that today it was their turn..

I think the fate of these groups and the fate of Mir Hossein Mousavi is the best clue in answering our first question.. Once, Mr. Moussavi had the opportunity to protest the unfair trials and executions of leftists and mujahideen, just as leftists and mujahideen could once protest the trials of imperial army officers.. Executions of the Year 67 Occurred under the circumstances that most of those executed had served their sentences.. One of the simplest and most banal legal principles tells us that an offender cannot be punished twice for a known crime. Even if we accept that those people were criminals, spending their retrial, after completing their sentences, violates the most basic principles accepted in the world.. Mr. Moussavi did not take advantage of the historic opportunity to protest, so that years later his most basic rights would be violated and imprisoned without trial or court of law..

A few weeks ago, Ahmad Jannati, head of the Guardian Council, said during Friday prayers that the Islamic Republic had been seditious. (Mousavi and Karroubi mean) He said he didn't execute them and was locked up alone.. Many reformists and supporters of the Green Movement rightly pointed out that a person whose crime has not yet been proven in a court cannot be threatened with execution, which itself is essentially a crime.. Even in the most backward dictatorships such as Nazi Germany or the Stalinist Communist Soviet Union, whenever they tried to eliminate a political dissident, they would first sentence him to death or imprisonment in an orderly court for false crimes.. Ahmad Jannati, who is at the head of one of the most important government positions of the Islamic Republic, still does not know such a banal issue. None of the reformists who referred to Jannati's ignorant statements, however, said that this level of impassionedness was not disclosed overnight in our country and was the result of a long-term process of violating the law and violating human rights.. If today in Iran, sattar beheshti is brought back to life without a legal order and returns the dead body with the effects of severe torture and then shamelessly stated that it was not murder, or if Abolfazl Abedini was beaten for defending workers' rights in Ahvaz's Karun Prison, or if Hossein Ronouzi had a property for making filter breakers and fighting censorship to a thousand and one pains and diseases. This sin is not merely directed at the Islamic Republic, but 80 million Iranian citizens share this crime with their irresponsible behavior..

The legal rights of human beings to their character and the right and wrong of their beliefs and actions are not measured to ensure that violations of their rights are measured accordingly.. Whether we're interested in or hating a character adds or diminishes his right. The right of citizens to their human status is defined on the basis that the violation of Mir Hossein Mousavi's citizenship rights is as ugly and intolerable as the violation of the rights of Ali Khamenei or Prince Reza Pahlavi.. Defending human rights and enforcing the basic moral and legal principles is not our choice, but the duty of every single one of us, citizens of society.. This is the kindness we do more than anyone in our own right and the future of our country..