The reasons for 50 tons of the most prominent scientists in the world who do not believe in the existence of God or religion properly

To believe in the existence or absence of God, no scientific or evidence or any trial is accountable for your questions.. It only depends on the understanding of thoughtful humans..

If you are not accountable to any scientific, evidence and trial, then what are the mastermind people to understand? How coordinated the perception of "mastermind people" is not based on testing, science, or evidence. How can thinking and perceptual be considered valid but not on the basis of any reasons?

However, I believe that God would deny my mother's mercy to me, and I have come to my own womb and evolve.

Your opinion is not important because we are talking about your intentions. Objective/Objective issues such as the emergence of people from the mother's womb or the evolution of issues related to the world are material and their authenticity with evidence and testing is proved. The opinion of people is related to the subjects.

That says 《 you, even if the world is made, does not cause god 》 and I must say that your opinion is completely non-منطقیه. I'm going to create a car that we now have, without getting to the hands of someone gradually.. Or a more vivid example of the not that you do not turn into any plant, so that one should get a grown-up to grow up but that plant cannot understand and realize you.. Because the world of plants is different.

My article I wrote for another user (I guess this post or post "Irdat" Mulla Sadra) Was that if we assume the world before the Big Bang, this is not necessarily the cause of God, while this assumption is a big assumption that before the Big Bang was not the time to be causation.. This type of curative deduction is fake. If we say because we do not know anything, then it is not necessarily God, then the "God of the holes" because they don't do something we can't get the desired result..
About the genesis of creatures is a different situation. We are certainly aware of the complexity of the evolution and the natural selection arise (Objective/Objective) That does not require smart creation..

Here's how I explained:

https://farda.us/?p=4743

The reasons for 50 tons of the most prominent scientists in the world who do not believe in the existence of God or religion properly

Dr.

I don't yet have a defense-based encyclopedia in one of the science branches so that my doctor is not talking about this moment.. In this website, I did not use the title of "Farhad" or "admin" until today, after the doctoral, if the need was directly addressed, the same admin or Farhad continues to be. Happy academic titles order produced by the mullahs!

What is your definition of time? Definition of high school physics mirror : Time is a quantity. A man who was a human being.. The time in itself is not external because we have created time for measuring and calculating the physics. There is not a parametric time that is already present and begins with the Big Bang.

I am not نعریفی of time! Your question is similar to how we ask someone: "In your opinion is Paris the capital of France, or Bulgaria?" It is evident that the geography of Paris is not an abstract and a matter of objectivity, and it is not important to our opinion.. If anyone is going to know that Paris is the capital of Bulgaria, it is not necessarily a bad thing.. To know where Paris is, there are some methods that are known to be beyond people..

The time is not a matter of abstract, which is subject to my definition.. The next time is fourth of the matter and is a measurable, visible, and independent category that is related to the material world and therefore this study is in the field of science. How long do we know when we have started with big explosions or the Big bang, isolation your opinion is irrelevant.. Starting time is a physical category, the new physics also has its own identification methods, and the knowledge of physics also says that the time before the explosion was not great.

Secondly, what causes big Bang.

Don't know! But because we don't means answer, you can be a pair of feet and a religious factor.! As I said, this is a name called "God of the holes.".

Third how do you think about religion? So, just with our empirical knowledge, should we expand all our vision and ideas? Religion has responded to many human questions, and I do not deny that he has entered every other person, but we have knowledge of wisdom.

In the case of the material world, only experimental sciences are eligible to examine subjects; about the world of transmaterial–If we have to do so,–I am not a means of understanding the metaphysics of wisdom like intuition for recognition. These same empirical sciences have shown that human beings, as mystical or supernatural scenarios, actually have natural roots and are not supernatural or immaterial.. I'll probably write something later..

Professor Chegini PhD in Plasma Physics is the father of plasma physics and a highly religious person. Dr. Golshani and many scientists who are experts in science and have a religious perspective.

Generally, the highest levels of scientists in the world are atheists.. Evidence suggests that the more elite scientists are, the more atheists they may be.. I've already linked a few places on this website where more than 90 percent of major scientists are atheists.. But what scientists think doesn't necessarily mean the existence or absence of God.. If we claim to be a fallacy called appeal to authority in Persian, it is something equivalent to "resorting to the parents of affairs", which is a logical fallacy..

Does human need metaphysics at all.

If we assume that human beings need something, it doesn't mean it'. Bertrand Russell shows very well that a proposition is correct simply because it is proven to be true, that it is beneficial.–Assuming it is–It's necessarily irrelevant..

It's so funny. . Science now has an omnomut of subsets and branches that every branch has its own thing to say.. What Your Excellency says science has to come to a conclusion, otherwise it'll be a scientific specter.. That's true, but there's a story that everyone's commenting on the amount according to their own point of view.. It doesn't take into account other aspects because the science of the branch branch is that interdisciplinary discussion comes up.. What you wrote is extremely simplistic..

Science has no branches and every branch of the natural sciences studies a part of the material world. Science is not a view. The view is a subjugative subject: objectivity and objective science is revocable. It's not a science expert's view, it's that person's perception of science that might be incorrect.

sir, there were scientific theories that have been rejected . String theory was rejected at some point and re-accepted. The theory of its name implies that it can be rejected if the reasons are scientific and justified.. In the meantime, according to the Big Bang theory, we all believe that the black hole clouds were created in moon when the explosion occurred. . Now the question is, what's causing the world not to regroup at one point due to gravity? Or in other words, preserve the world? That's where the constant cosmic argument or dark matter comes in, and dark matter itself is a flaw in the Big Bang theory..

Scientific theory cannot be rejected. I'm not here with you, and I don't have free time.. I'm just passing what I know, just because I believe that clean methods of misfor'a should be available to everyone.. The rest is with you.! I wrote in response once and I don't argue again..

But as you pointed out, the Big Bang has helped the world to know a lot, the reasons for proving it is more than the reasons for its rejection, my dear Mohsen Sharifpour, an Iranian scientist has proved that the Big Bang was not the beginning of the world, this proof shocked the world..

It's crap.!

The reasons for 50 tons of the most prominent scientists in the world who do not believe in the existence of God or religion properly
Scientific Theory Can't be rejected If rejected, it is not scientific theory.. Theory is a generality that has been tested over and over again and has been proven to be true.. Not all theories are in a degree of dogma. To measure the dogma of theories, they use a tool called criteria of adequacy equivalent to "correct criteria", which is out of the question, but the general theory of knowledge is not rejected..

About String Theory I translated a Pop Science documentary a few years ago that It's visible from here. Is.

The example you give is an example of an equivocation fallacy that assumes two or more similar things in the name, which are not necessarily equal.. Several assumptions with this name have been emphasized by string theory that are not theories and have been rejected.. This is even the subject of a number of yellow and popular articles called string theory, but as far as physics or any branch of natural sciences is concerned, if something is accepted as theory, it cannot be rejected by one or more experiments.. It may be merged later in a larger framework that gives a better explanation of the material world, but it is not rejected..

Of the actions of the Iranian Shiites: The Kaaba and the black stone wall ruin turn to rock the toilet bowl
The toilet is the mouth of the one who pushed you to lower the average IQ of Iranians!
Muslim! Momen! Retarded! Illiterate! Somebody's for 20 years. / Urinating in the stone of al-Aswad, you have also paid your life for hajj pilgrimage to be filled with a toilet bowl stone; what is my crime? I just got the point، and I left the source.. Go to the Gospel of God and ask God to give you a piece of stone.. Then kiss me with a big kiss.!

(With two years of delay, this user has a broken mouth.!)

Of the actions of the Iranian Shiites: The Kaaba and the black stone wall ruin turn to rock the toilet bowl
A book published by an academic publication, such as Yale University, which is an expert in this field, is called a reliable source.! Instead of writing three times what you believe and what you don't believe, look at the source and the content once..

Insult to Cyrus the great in University of Tabriz
This "knowing" of you and your kind has made me one in these fourteen – Fifteen years when I was familiar with you, the beasts perished.!
of course, i have to admit, i still don't understand what this "turk" means to you.! You know enough, and then you have done the same thing..

Iran's expulsion of the Imam
Hello

Before we get to the definition of ignorance, these two images are both photoshopped.. So that your image is not deleted and others will know what we're talking about in the future and don't click on your link (It's not safe.!) i'll put a copy of your image here:

Please pay attention.: Photoshop images can be identified by certain software, and these two images are both photoshopped.. This means that the description may have been photoshopped in the first image, in the second image the brick was added to the wall or added to the first image of the panel for the second explanation..

But It doesn't matter.! In order to understand the ignorance you are referring to, it doesn't matter which image is photoshopped.. Even in the image you sent, the guy holding the letter put it in the well.–That his 1,200-year-old Imam, who beed imam at the age of five and broke his seven-year-old grandfather's record in his Shiite imamate,– Sing, it's the same as ignorance..

If for any reason he doubts the existence of a person with the identity of the Imam of time
Or you don't believe that you're providing evidence from written sources or documents.

You (And your like-minded people.) You have an unusual claim (extraordinary claim) About the 1,200-year-old Imam and his well that you are obliged to bring proof of the authenticity of your claimi'm not obliged to show against your claim.

Bernard Lewis's speech on Iran; Iran, parsing, architect at the University of Tel-Aviv
If you searched, but I could not commands from me more than this one, you have my own writings in the same article.. My grace is more than yours.