In the section Comments from previous entryOne of the readers asked me to fake articles in conjunction with the Louvre website (With the Louvre Museum of Paris not to mistake!) Concerning the identity of the Achaemenid Cyrus write explanation.

واقعیت این است که ما امکان پاسخگویی به همه ی این تحریفاتی که روز به روز دامنه اش فراتر می رود را نداریم و این وبسایت لور هم دستکم دهها مطلب جعلی و تحریف تاریخی انتشار داده و پاسخ به همه ی اینها در توان ما نیست.

On the other hand is no Adam sanity for historical information not Scouting the Louvre website. بنابر این من بر خلاف خواسته ی این دوست مخاطبم قصد پاسخگویی نداشتم؛ اما در این مورد خاص به موضوع جالب تری از خود مقاله برخوردم که انگیزه ای برای نوشتن این مطلب شد که به آن هم در ادامه اشاره خواهم کرد.

Apparently the person named Sajjad momeni» this entry and it is not known exactly this name like it "Spring mOr to quote himself, "مئهران باهارلی", Pan, jael is fake or the real character of jael brghza hand loverha the water accordingly? There is, and that any more lies about this person; Non-Iranian identity berzan Arroyo We reply in the same site and is one of the drawbacks to which we subject why not ادعایش and no rferns source?

Apparently the new entry about the identity of Cyrus, a کتابنامه hand and foot that with his article At this address Available:

English reading a historical hoax Cyrus

K. after reaching the Elamite language official languages announced power picks up, this is a very important point. According to the history that we have imposed, the ruler of the Medes, Cyrus before the land, so historians have declared that the material of the language has been the Iranian languages: Persian, from a family that has been quite a lot of similarities.. So as to say that his Persian language should have similar median during the rulers of governance has been a first language home language has been selected as the.

Sajjad momeni

A member of the US Council of writers

Introduction:

در این مقاله قصد دارم با آوردن شواهد و قرائن متعدد این فرضیه را که کوروش عیلامی بوده است و پارسی نبوده است را قوت ببخشم، در این مقاله و سلسله مقالات بعدی این امر را که پارسی خواندن کورش جعل تاریخ است را ثابت خواهم کرد و به این امر می‌پردازم که چگونه بعد از مرگ کورش و روی کار آمدن کمبوجیه اشراف پارس به کمک یهودیان بر علیه سلسله عیلامی خاندان کورش کودتا کردند و از آن پس به جعل گسترده تاریخ پرداختند.

Perhaps the first thing that we need to know about his case, Cyrus in all the old documents are listed under anshan Cyrus. Its your آنشانی Cyrus everywhere can read and others he would have know Cyrus آنشانی. Anshan is one of the States has been عیلامیان which includes the regions of Fars and izeh mamasani, کهگلویه and Boyer Ahmad is the. Anshan is more a symbol of the capital of the Assyrian Empire and the State has been a sort of religious capital سوسیانا عیلامیان. In old sources, sometimes we do not distinguish between Elam and anshan lump sum is the difference we make in the name of Elamite, sometimes a thing called آنشانی have also. The name is much older anshan ازپیدایش PARS.

For example, the epic saga of the world's oldest that Gil gmsh and the flower on his will has been found in Mesopotamia can be mentioned the name of anshan, in this story is the story of the hero of the gmsh Gil arcuate kamani in the story arc to it آنشانی say, that in order to show it's probably Elamite and bows This is the first and best ancient bows made by عیلامیان.[2]

In another old source called نابونیدوس, one of the history of ancient Babylonian cuneiform tablet that is written on the flower and now in the British Museum in London maintained, Cyrus and her arrival to give us detailed information of Babylon lays. In this inscription آنشانی کوراش Cyrus learned only by name, in no place this Tablet does not like to be told our k. Parsi or parswa.[3] In the third column and the line 26 Umm this inscription, is the man with the کوراش openly clothing describes Elamite. [4]

Jose Alvarez Moon researcher and Professor at the University of Sydney, while the analysis of these ancient writings says” A very important point is that we understand why the person discussed in this posts covering the Elamite?” Then some of the scholars that without having any reason to say in order to cover this cover is Persian, Elamite problem and says: The notion that we have to dress the Elamite without reason to translate Persian dress stump should be obsolete.”[5] Then mention some historians because ( Astronakh, ویسهافر, and Jewish.…) That's how these are speculative writes: “In fact, these historians and many more like them than to the application of this Babylonian writings that they are wholly unjustifiable and blunt.”[6] Here only in order to dress the Elamite, Dear Professor Alvarez Moon attire have interpreted it and emphasized that it means covering the overall makeup and that includes dress, Crown and… .[7]

Brasti if the Board is k, why should enter with Elamite Babylon? Except not all of Kings during the coronation, worship, attendance at meetings and assemblies, the uncle, war, and soldiers of the Royal family and their nation, travel clothes to wear? What dynasty of dynasties and often small and what a great cover for certain have been. Why should this incident important Cyrus dress wears Elamite?

Let's take a look at the scrolls, if we'll see that the image is in the Persian Darius the Darius inscriptions in Bisotun, have picture rated clothing and cover is quite inconsistent with عیلامیان. Why is there even a decent image of Cyrus that he show with Persian clothing? Why is the only role that today the ratio of Cyrus, Cyrus is staffed entirely with Elamite and makeup of the show? Some have remarked, that” Barks that Cyrus have been ancestors, at the beginning of the entrance to the Iranian plateau and anshan have survived the attack because his power base, and since that time the local dominant anshan Cyrus generation.”

No small even in the hands of a document that we will prove to be a slave to the anshan RAID barks and there have been dominant. Historians and writers of older PARS Pan claimed that the attack on the بانیپال to Assyria in Assyrian Empire 647 BC عیلامیان utterly destroyed and forever from the scene of the universe were destroyed. Later this theory to be themselves being sought and claimed the attack in a year; 647 BC Assyria Bunny PAL to completely destroy the Elam Elam did, though, but the scene of politics and power went. In fact, I have to say the attack 647 BC Assyria Bunny PAL to the State of Susa in Elam, in a short and plunder the wealth of conquered and destroyed several of the temple and fortress… And not in some degree that makes serious face with عیلامیان pores.

K. after reaching the Elamite language power announces official language, this is a very important point. در اکثر نوشته‌های بدست آمده در دوران کورش زبان عیلامی زبان اول و بیشترین نوشته‌ها و لوح ها به این زبان نوشته شده است و زبان دوم هم اکدی است و در بعضی از کتیبه‌ها چند خط کوتاه هم به زبانی که مورخان نامش را پارسی باستان گذاشته‌اند نوشته شده است که زبان مردم پارسوا بوده است.

If as some objective historians say has been the Persian Cyrus why have not declared barks first language? According to the history that we have imposed, the ruler of the Medes, Cyrus before the land, so historians have declared that the material of the language has been the Iranian languages: Persian, from a family that has been quite a lot of similarities.. So as to say that his Persian language should have similar median during the rulers of governance has been a first language home language has been selected as the. Cyrus is that according to these historians has been barking so what is the reason that the Elamite language as the first language of choice?

Most important thing about this case is that if these historians say that Elamite attack after Assyria has quite poor and PAL Bonnie barks to the country of Elam attacked and are ruling it is true, how is it that the Elamite language during their efficiency completely of all Cyrus Comment keep and replacing it is not Persian?

Do not think that this is better that Cyrus has been the native Elamite and ABBA and their ancestral language has proclaimed the first?

If the conditions as to say we, because for many years it has been the official language material should again after the power transfer of material or language used at least one of the languages of the community, because it is close to. Do we see a bias and prejudice are plentiful on the behalf of the Elamite language are Cyrus? This prejudice on the Elamite language, why? Do historians sponsors their PARS and pan on this point on a big lie we have not delivered?

Mikhail rostotsf (m. rostovtzef f ( On the ancient world says; “K. in all political matters of the same policies and practices of Government has used عیلامیان.”[9] ,[8]

According to the information obtained from the scrolls of the same religion, and religion and also Cyrus the coterie of people and the coterie has been Mesopotamia sagros, and no religion has never been Corp. [10]

If so assume مورخانی say that a few generations ago have been پارسیانی Cyrus to get power, and anshan, how is it that this is their religion and rituals they speed has been changed? Even if the optimistic look and say that their religion to the people even Corp Elam (As the historians has weakened) Have not imposed, should at least in sight of their religion and their coterie has to be preserved. Is there any logical reason for calling the Persian Gulf there is Cyrus?

The conclusion of the: حقیقت این است که داریوش پارسی زمانی که با کمک یهودیان و اشراف پارس موفق شد تا برنامه کودتا بر علیه پسران کورش یعنی کمبوجیه و بردیا را عملی کند، ابتدا برای دور کردن جنایت از خود داستان جعلی گوماته مغ را سرهم کرد و سپس برای کسب مشروعیت و ثابت کردن اینکه تنها جانشین برحق کوروش است، سعی کرد تا شناسنامه پارسی برای کوروش صادر کند، برای این امر هم افسانه زایش کوروش را ساخت و خود و کوروش را در دو خط موازی به یک نیای مشترک وصل کرد.

در مقالات تکمیلی مفصلا به بررسی کودتای داریوش و اشراف پارس با یاری بنی اسراییل، غصب سلطنت و تاریخسازی جعلی آنها خواهم پرداخت.

ادامه دارد…

1- e.g. Gordon (1967), bakhtiari territory

2- Epic of gilgamesh,

3- The Nabonidus Chronicle (British Museum)

4- The Nabonidus Chronicle ‘ (columniii –line 26)
5- j alvarez mon , Notes On The ‘Elamite’ Garment Of Cyrus The Great
6- j alvarez mon , Notes On The ‘Elamite’ Garment Of Cyrus The Great
7- j alvarez mon , Notes On The ‘Elamite’ Garment Of Cyrus The Great
8- history of ancient world, michael rostovtzef f
9- walter hinz “the lost world of elam” translated by jeniffer barnes, london 1972

10- Dandamayev Cyrus (iii. Cyrus the Great) Cyrus’ religious policies.

برای خواننده دقیق به فرض اینکه هیچ آشنایی قبلی هم با موضوع نوشته نداشته باشد؛ نویسنده در همان مقدمه توضیح داده که هدفش جعل و تحریف واقعیت است و دیگر نیازی هم به خواندن باقی مطلب نخواهد بود.

In the introduction to this entry brought:

در این مقاله قصد دارم با آوردن شواهد و قرائن متعدد این فرضیه را که کوروش عیلامی بوده است و پارسی نبوده است را قوت ببخشم، در این مقاله و سلسله مقالات بعدی این امر را که پارسی خواندن کورش جعل تاریخ است را ثابت خواهم کرد و به این امر می‌پردازم که چگونه بعد از مرگ کورش و روی کار آمدن کمبوجیه اشراف پارس به کمک یهودیان بر علیه سلسله عیلامی خاندان کورش کودتا کردند و از آن پس به جعل گسترده تاریخ پرداختند.

Whether you have a hypothesis is not the same thing that's constant apologies because each of these practices and tools used a different brand.

To make the hypothesis that the strength of the argument based on the mfrwadatman weren't the type we use solely the results strengthen subvert fashion, but something does not prove; that is, we do not necessarily result from mfrwadatman and from the beginning it also not systematic . اما در استقرا مفروضات ما هر آنچه که هست قطعا ما را به نتایجی میرساند اینجا دیگر بحث بر سر آوردن شواهد و قراین برای قوت بخشیدن به یک فرضیه نیست.

When written in the beginning of a writer says lack of Persian and Elamite hypothesis like Cyrus's strengths, being a pure boy and more writes because of Elamite and Persian Cyrus dont forge bi-lingual language; while the reader that I mention چرندبافی and distorted history! Because the first step in making the same assumption of historical judgment tool baznshanakhte therefore, it is not an argument at all has jurisdiction.

Of this introduction that otherwise go to mokharh and look at all his his بیاندازینم resources:

In the English articles are generally of two types of my "standard" and "led" to a PDF using a کتابنامه reference sites such as Britannica also follows a major purveyor of both practices are mentioned for reference users. But all of these are to show the validity of the reference for a blog post and merely showing the validity of resources to none of these practices do not require scripting source is enough to provide the reader information you put up to hear you've properly rather than take from and to your references That actually refer to the article are assumptions. This information includes the author's name, year of publication, the name of انتشارکتاب, the name of the book and page of the book is. If mrjaman is also the Internet easily can we insert the page address. English with reference to whether it is not something to do with it does not give. Others also use English references if that's that are more available because Ali al-scientific articles and books in English than any other language translations are published and also that our scientific work is finally in all cases is not available. But if the same reference is valid in English was available; certainly for the reader is the preferred language is English and it is not necessary from the bottom of one of his books, کتابنامه sense, and it also has surgery we insert ourselves in the bottom of the article! Here, for example, that English is "epic of Gilgamesh"

2- Epic of gilgamesh,

"Your epic of Gilgamesh» what gave his English to write that? Now that his English also wrote his reference? This epic of Gilgamesh from where? The author himself read the inscription on a stone and has translated from Sumerian? It is impossible to assume that if such is the case in the translation itself and should also be mentioned with the location of the release and give it a reference date. But if it is a translation of another version translated to the hand who has been revert? Where printed and chtoro with what purpose a part of it in this post is going to come to us to sell counterfeit identity being Cyrus?

You can see that this is not a reference to any reference as the rest of these resources together with comparable tragedy have referred. دست بر قضا من یکی از این مطالب را روی اینترنت پیدا کردم و خواندم که درباره ی آن هم توضیح خواهم داد و دلیل نگارش این نوشته هم در واقع همان مقاله است.

But first of all want to have a multi-line brief tort I Bob sources reliable in the sphere of historical studies on the subject of counterfeiting, because it is difficult to write every day is our! Faced with such articles that are really on how the reader should decide? For example, how should I know whether Cyrus is Persian or Parsi, forging its farsha? How do I understand that Elamite or Cyrus or leave Turkestan? To assume that the information about the subject had previously also Cyrus; if not familiar with the subject of the article, what should I do?

The definitive answer to the questions referred to above is encyclopedia. General reference encyclopedia of human knowledge for the best and are always available to the Dehkhoda dictionary, except, unfortunately, have that in some cases can be used as an encyclopedia it is no a valid encyclopedia of bulls in English on the Internet. But in the English language and even specialized encyclopedia available that make us a lot of information. The most important feature of the Encyclopedia Britannica and the Internet, such as Encyclopaedia Iranica (In matters relating to Iran) بروزرسانی دایم آنها است چون دانش انسانها محدود است و همواره گسترش می یابد با گسترش دانش ما در حوزه های مختلف، مقالات دانشنامه ها هم دایما بروز رسانی می شوند.

In the case of Cyrus the great article Britannica site And Encyclopaedia Iranica website Articles are reference. در بسیاری از موارد مقالات دانشنامه ها هم توسط چندین متخصص نوشته می شوند مثلا در بریتانیکا آمده که بخش اعظم مقاله توسط ریچارد فرای نوشته شده؛ پروفسور فرای معتبرترین ایرانشناس حال حاضر است با اینجال باز هم در مقاله تغییراتی اعمال کردند یا احتمالا بخشهایی افزوده اند.

As far as Cyrus is related; both of these articles show that the Achaemenid Persian Cyrus and friend to this community, not a hoax its lerman Pan even if English is not to come to the technology helps and can Google site Articles for translation and at least limited of generalities we informed written.

مع الوصف اگر در آینده هم شواهد جدیدی بدست آمد و ثابت شود که کورش هخامنشی ترک ترکستان یا عرب حجازی بوده و اجماعی در مورد این کشف جدید توسط علمای این رشته حاصل شد؛ آنگاه مندرجات این دو مقاله دانشنامه که پیوند دادم، ویرایش خواهند شد؛ اما تا آن زمان کورش هخامنشی کماکان پارسی است.

Except for the encyclopedia, is the most important resource, educational books that were published by academic publications in universities and its students are taught to field. Educational resources are generally not written by one person and of a specialized encyclopedia, trend and are published with the aim of training; if the encyclopedia are merely presenting a topic around the profile up so this is for the more specialized topics should see textbooks. Of course, the textbooks are two major forms of first to the size of the encyclopedia are not available or access to free them, and secondly, will not update دایما. نتیجه می گیرم آن دسته از کتب آموزشی دانشگاهی که توسط انتشارات دانشگاهی معتبر به چاپ رسیده اند، اهمیت دارند که تاریخ انتشارشان به زمان ما نزدیک تر باشد.

After these two books are reference group provided by academic professors with rank workmanship (The master of all) Are published in a string. این کتابها لزوما به اندازه کتب آموزشی اهمیت ندارند چون آن مطالب با تصحیحات و بازخوانیهای متعدد بیرون می آیند با اینحال این کتابها هم که با اهداف آموزشی منتشر می شوند قابل ارجاع اند در اینجا هم نویسنده بسیار اهمیت دارد.

In the next stage, the articles are not necessarily educational aspects of articles;; unlike the collegiate educational workbooks that provide the transmission of information to the students some of the articles are written solely for the experts to provide opinions and assumptions, and the new plan is therefore very important that the ordinary reader will note In addition to being a post written by whom and where on the release, written with what purpose? What is tone exactly what استنتاجاتی? And of all the Royal and religious consensus paradigm of it disciplines on the subject of that article?

Basically the new science also works to who فرضیاتی and mfrwadatshan to strengthen the evidence they pose. Some of the assumptions are highly هنجارشکن and in contradiction with the opinions are not necessarily a hoax, but the ruling is considered. از صدها فرضیه که حول یک موضوع خاص مطرح می شوند معدود نظریاتی بیرون می آید تا در نهایت برخی از آنها به عنوان نظریات مطرح و برخی دیگر به عنوان یک باور علمی مورد پذیرش جامعه علمی قرار گیرند بنابر این یک فرضیه برای اینکه مورد پذیرش قرار گیرد راه طولانی در پیش دارد به همین جهت در مورد محنوای مقالات با دقت بیشتری هم باید برخورد کرد.

The last reference that we can use in our first-hand sources; تحقیقاتمان; like the author of the epic of Gilgamesh refers to the Louvre site and of course does not take her time; n Pourpirar The Torah is very interested in first-hand sources; also in the case of a referral should consider its top clerics are string along. Especially in the field of the humanities and social sciences this is also more important issue because we are in most cases, atleteman is very limited and we do not use the methods correctly. هر چه یک شخصیت در یک حوزه شناخته شده تر باشد بیشتر هم میتواند به چنین منابعی استناد کند با اینحال کماکان از نظر موافق دیگر محققان بی نیاز نیست.

But the story that prompted me to all of this description, an article from the University of Cambridge library that come from an archeology journal ونویسنده is a لکترور(Nor is the master) The University of Sydney خاویه is the name of the author of the site alorazmor interesting that small name Lor لکترور also changed the University of Sydney! Each of these authors «خاویه» to the Louvre or the author of the "José", not a Professor, not an Assistant Professor and associate professor, and not merely the teaching in University. This article is the same as the Louvre site claims is the reference version of the paper can be Get out of here.

Undoubtedly, the friends of Pan لریستمان happened and sometimes وبگردی effects of fraghtshan in the library of the University of Cambridge, this article is not necessarily a specialized article and did not find a way to his messianic Persian version *. Of course, one thing that is interesting for my cooperation with the universities of Sydney University Archeology part bastanshnasan of Israel is not necessarily a strange thing also but not These last two examples of their lecture schedule Is.

To summarize in this article has been based on the contents of the efforts is a plaque to plaque and نبونید name in British میوزیوم and other items about the clothes and some customs of the Achaemenid Cyrus and Cambyses raised the hypothesis that perhaps the city of Anshan in the sixth century BC, and the Elamite history Cyrus also is among the same group:

To conclude, available textual, artistic and material evidence invites us to consider that, within the context of elite late neo-Elamite garments, the author of the Nabonidus Chronicle may have done no more than state the obvious: in 538 bc Cyrus went to Babylon clad in traditional, Elamite-style, ceremonial attire, conceivably to be identified with a fine, cotton-made, fringed garment, ornamented with ladder bands including golden bracteates. To a Babylonian audience, so it seems, the king of Anšan may not have been recognized independently from an Elamite cultural heritage. It must be conceded, however, that much remains unknown about the cultural characteristics of the city of Anšan during the sixth century bc and about how the Elamite past of Anšan was perceived during this time. In this latter context, the label Anšanite may have acquired a different meaning from one that would have been familiar to a Babylonian audience: it may have come to represent a new political reality that was viewed in the highlands of Iran as increasingly distinct from an earlier Elamite configuration

دقت کنید در این مقاله مطلقا چیزی اثبات نمی شود و نویسنده هم چنین ادعایی ندارد. Merely a hypothesis and efforts to boost the provision of evidence with mfrwadatsh but no definite outcome looks not.

The basic question here is who and with what purposes such articles from among thousands of paper and return back to English? Who is the cost of printing these articles and with what purpose does a deal to finally bring the authors of the Louvre site portal?

Because if you were to be translated content is very important and there is more about the history of Iran, the Persian Empire still to English is not brgrdanndeh. پیشتر هم توضیح دادم امکان ایجاد یک خطر جدی در میان بختیاریها وجود ندارد چون ملی گرایی در میان این گروه بسیار ریشه دار است اما امکان ایجاد نوعی قومگرایی برای تضعیف نیروها و توان بالقوه ما در میان این قوم وجود دارد تا برای دیگر جریانات تجزیه طلب در خوزستان و کردستان و آذربایجان فضای فعالیت بیشتر پدید بیاورد.