Feed
SSL
My YouTube
I have all the argument proving the existence of God reviews and got none of them valid in terms of the logical نیافتم. – Bertrand Russell (Minutes 9.:00 اینجا Or اینجا)
What we need is the will for not having faith; the will to search that is perfectly in order to the contrary it is. –Bertrand Russell
Three years ago that the story about the logical argument errors صدیقین Avicenna wrote the story about friendship, the logic Mulla صدیقین argument errors, and write this entry I prepared at the earliest opportunity. What happened in the wake of being repeatedly attacked by the Internet site, and later also the promise was forgotten almost. Nevertheless, by the delayed this post about the logical argument proving the existence of God by errors of Mulla sadra write.
Mulla sadra
The argument is, like Mulla sadra The argument Descartes And Ibn Sina Including برهانهای, despite being (Ontological arguments) That is of the essence and existence of God tries to prove him to have. From the direction of this argument as argument الصدیقین (The best and the best argument) Learn to be the non-existence of God because to prove it will not resort to.
Mulla sadra Such claims:
1.) There's having/entity
2.) There is no superior having Kamali Kamali, since it does not exist
3.) God is perfection and perfection is in existence (The existence of having)
4.) This single truth (Yekta) Is; (The concept of having multiple however does not exist)
5) This is the truth of God in perfection has a rank
۶) This perfection is the highest-rated available somewhat there is existence of having top-order
7.) So there is a God
Proving the existence of God, through the assumption of it
This argument can be anslm with the argument or the argument Descartes compare:
Ansam Canterbury:
Inventory defined the existence of God that "something of superior it is not imaginable." asks ansam: "Which is superior? What is just in understanding (Fantasy) There are indeed come or what? "the answer is certainly that is something that in the universe there are actually. Since God is, according to تعریفش, the inventory from which there is no superior; therefore, it must be sure to be there. God could not exist even in fantasy.
Descartes:
God is a creature that is pleasant all there having a primal perfection; consequently there is God.
The top two errors about argument A separate entry The explanation I gave and that therefore the argument is given part of the earlier.
Gave a proof of the actual existing abstract perfection
Except for the first objection should be added that the concept of موجویت is strictly defined as the abstract and the real world is not nothing to do with perfection. If we assume that God is perfection and perfection is to know that it is not related to the real world then we can argue:
1.) God of perfection/perfection is significant
2.) Perfection is a concept of abstract concepts/ What in the world there is a real
3.) Perfect creatures exist (A monument is that of two versions of Mulla sadra's had previously been designated Castaway!)
4.) Consequently there is no God
Or so:
1.) God is the perfection of the pleasant (Given all the above براهین)
2.) If God created the world, the world should be full of God's existence (Compare with the argument from evil of اپیکوروس/David Hume)
3.) Perfect world/pleasant is not perfection
4.) Consequently there is no God
PI wrote
This page was removed from the server and the older version was replaced. The latest version of Google Cache, on December 4, 2020, From here Available.
Section: 
Tags: 
You are not the result of the complete existence of God, there is God who is the two of the other
ShowThis proposition is not "Allah" from the presumed Mulla Sadra and not an independent claim;.
ShowExactly the argument of Khalfeh Handsauce we assume is a false sentence, we assume that Allah is not a problem.
ShowThat Mulla Sadra was not the cause of Allah, because he did not prove God and he should not say, how is God going through Allah, assuming Allah is not the hypothesis of the khdanabaor.
ShowWhat I wrote to you is from the presumed Mulla Sadra that God is absolute perfection by understanding this proposition that absolute perfection is a single and abstract concept (The condition of accepting Plato's opinion) There is no result of Allah and not the proposition of "Allah" is independently..
Third issue of the presumed Mulla Sadra–That the arguments and assumptions in the Stanford Encyclopedia and I link from there–From the mghrwadat of the argument, there is also Descartes that Kant has properly revealed its error. And Descartes, like Mulla Sadra, proved something that they had assumed!
Click the link that I wrote in a separate article and see the error of their arguments..
ShowPrecisely the argument of the posteriorly in the handsauce we assume is a false sentence, we're gonna prove Allah is God's rule to assume Allah is not a problem.
ShowNow we conclude that God does not exist. So what? How do you do and gossip this? For example, assuming that all people in the world were stupid and were believable to the absence of God, well, what is it? denies God and the Prophets…It will not believe in another world. So what do you really mean? So what hope you are alive. It is not possible to know the creator with the argument and the mere intellect. Knowing he is the heart of Taher wants that with the delis not full of lust and filth is never known. You will continue to have the same absurd way Give. When you do not believe in it, it turns out that it is not God or not. But we live with this beautiful belief in God, and for the sake of believing in him, we believe that you are trying to not exceed anyone and lie down, and like you, The interests are not material. You will continue the same thing. Although the continuation of life for someone who does not believe in God and the right, it is not wise and shall end up in the direction of the guidance of his life. You will be Aateghadshma for yourself because you are not the same. I know someone who has really come to the emptiness ends his life. But they will throw you in for a few more Sabah worlds, dance welcome them. Do not forget that God is inviting him to Allah, because he believes that there is a great invitation to him?
ShowYour response اینجا I gave.
ShowThe argument of sediism and existential, not the annulment,. Are honest. The sole assumption of acceptance and compliance is applicable. Meanwhile, the proof of the written of the Allameh Tabatabaei does not require any hypothetical what the realization of a reality is not realizing a reality. Even the world's assumption is not a reality, it's a fact. The last point is that all the evidence of the argument of existential and causation becomes a idealism, suppose the idealism is true, so the idea of the ablist is doomed to silence..
ShowWhen and where did you see a written argument that logic should be revoked?
I also wrote a joint on my own and explained for other users about why the proof of Mulla Sadra (Authentic ' Vallid’ And Sadegh ' sound ') Offline. The argument of Ansalm is not an ultrasound that showed the first time Kant and I link inside the same article. About causality in the same blog I explained that the causality could not prove God's existence..
That no hypothetical need is a logical argument (Deductive argument) Offline. Every Borhani has assumptions and results from assumptions. Instead of the general letter, you can link the assumption of the presumption to others to familiarize the philosophers of the world with this Allameh Tabatabaei..
ShowMy dear, your problem is that you see the mind separate from the objective world, and that's why you say it's a concept of expectation, these things are thoroughly discussed and resolved in Islamic philosophy, please read.
Show