The world in 1945

Get extensive influence with the Persian-language media was alien and neutral and free news media inside Iran, gradually some phrases and terminology was also entered the political vocabulary of fake Iranians. Including these fakes, one applicable as "nation" or "nationality" is not only that the Iranian tribes among the reformists left or media analysis was common, but is now in most of the State-run media such as BBC Persian, "alien", "Reuters", "online" or "day of the Deutsche Welle English» There are application. This is a hoax title, for political purposes and account for some preset do that in this post, we are more familiar with the reasons for it.

The Nations of Iran or of Iranian ethnic groups?

Both the titles of "nation" and "people" are used for human groups, but these two are not the same concepts of the term.

تفاوت«گروه قومی» و «ملت» در ارتباط با مفهوم دیگری به نام «کشور» یا واحد سیاسی مستقل، تعیین می شود.^I The nation is merely to say that independent groups the country's environment, and perhaps for the same reason that any alien, for Persian-language media refer to the ethnic groups in their respective countries and اتنیکی of the term "nation", do not use.

For example, has never been seen that online radio zamaneh or day that are run at the expense of the Government of the Netherlands, the Dutch people for the use of the titles or the voice of America and Radio Farda to people living in the United States, the United Nations or the people of Germany, Deutsche Welle, the German Nations say.

Unlike the ancient country of Iran – Thousands of years of historical – New countries such as the USA and Switzerland zohoori compilation of a diverse range of different Nations that are ahead of the birth of these countries were independent life. This historical components still use various aspects of certain features, its cultural and historical; however none of the constituent ethnic groups of the nation cannot be read in these countries, but in all cases a nation called the "American people" or "nation" and a Swiss nationality as American "wedge" or "سوییسی" Itself and the rest of the groups «کالچر» Saab (Subculture) Or ethnic group can be read. In the United States as even to the Indians before the birth of the bands American country were independent Nations history or at least not commonly associated with American country.

With this gathering harshly not this question here is that the purpose of inventing this as "Nations" or "nationalities" for what is an Iranian tribes and basically what this subject matter can have? The answer to this question is another concept of "self-determination" lies.

Right to self-determination

The "self-determination" of those concepts is a long history of political literature in the world, and of the various opinions and متباین and متضادی defined; each of the تعاریفی of this concept can be offered at your place and be accepted or rejected the concept of groups; A legal aspect in international relations that we are merely here the same way we consider a legal.

In 1941, and in the wake of the end of World War II, the allies were to sign a document in which "the right to self-determination of peoples" had been mentioned; the next year, the statement signed by the other 26 countries and later in the year 1945 the Charter of the United Nations to pass "» 1906.

In season one, article one, the second part of the "United Nations Charter" and also in "civil and political rights treaty between Nations," the nation's "right of self-determination", mentioned the possibility of independence; the right to various communities under certain circumstances and provides. On the basis of this legal right areas where local governments were borders and earlier (Colony and colony are mainly) But the country is still known as the نمیشدند, they have the possibility to notify their independence as sovereign States. Subsequently since 1946 until the year 1960, thirty-seven new countries from the Asian, African and Middle Eastern colonies inside the head they.

Self-determination in their recent concept – That takes political units independent – Can be defined solely for the nation. In other words, only the communities as "nation" to be recognized the right to form their own independent countries are. In the definition of the nation or the people that this is the right one to them, to all the population is said to be that regardless of the differences, have occupied a land. قوانین بین المللی گروههای قومی یا اقلیت ها را به عنوان مردم/ملت نمی شناسد.^{II III}

From here it can be the target of counterfeiting as "nation" or "nationality" – Or in a new form that some media, as both nationality and ethnicity (Nationality/ethnicity) Time for meaning and show them they can provide synonyms – BN.. What is that if any of the constituent components of the Iranian people, a nation known to be independent and this title to refer to the Iranian peoples and among Iranians and the international community in the mstleh, the next step is probably Iran's analysis is based on the self-determination of Nations will be the Foundation of the new.

In یاشیم, when the right to self-determination was recognized for the emerging Nations, the greater part of the world was composed of colonies and none of these countries were not part of the United Nations. در واقع بیانیه اعطای حق تعیین سرنوشت به ملت ها و مستعمرات «به هبچ وجه به معنای حق تعیین سرنوشت به وسیله تجزیه دیگر کشورها نیست».^IV

Separatism a crime or legal right;?

برخی فعالین سیاسی – از جمله حامیان حقوق بشر – تجزیه طلبی را هم بخشی از حقوق شهروندان قلمداد می کنند و به همین علت بسیاری از کسانی که در ایران جرایم تجزیه طلبانه مرتکب می شوند – علاوه بر آن عده که اساسا جرایم دیگری دارند و زندانی عقیده و وجدان لقب گرفتند. – زندانیان سیاسی و فعالین حقوق مدنی لقب می گیرند.

پاسخ به این پرسش که آیا تجزیه طلبی از حقوق قانونی افراد است یا باید جرم تلقی شود، در نظر افراد مختلف، متفاوت است؛ اما در قوانین بین المللی مشخصا از «تجزیه طلبی» با عنوان «جرم بسیار سنگین» یاد می شود.

In accordance with article 38 of the Statute International Court of Justice Or the World Court, as the official reference of international laws, "the secession" as one of the most heavy crimes "is known". مشخصا هرگونه اقدام داخلی علیه تمامیت ارضی یک کشور یا هر گونه کوششی برای لطمه زدن به تمامیت ارضی یک کشور شامل حتی اقدامات تدرکاتی/مقدماتی به عنوان سنگین ترین جرایم در میان قوانین تمام ملل متمدن ارزیابی می شود.^V

به همین شیوه، کشورها هم مکلف هستند که در جهت اخلال یا از میان بردن همبستگی ملی یا تمامیت ارضی کشورهای دیگر گام برندارند و هرگونه تلاشی در این جهت محکوم است.^VI

1. Armosino, A. (2003). Hermeneutics and Inculturation. The Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. pg 100. ‘difference between ethnic group and nation, it would be the word State. Nation refers to some state, either existing or desired.’

   [↪]

2. Musgrave, T. (1997). Self-determination and national minorities. Oxford monographs in international law. Clarendon Press. ‘paragraph 6 of Resolution 1514(XV), whose effect precludes ethnic groups within non-self-governing territories from being considered as peoples.’

   [↪]

3. Gudeleviciute, V. (2005). Does the Principle of Self-determination Prevail over the Principle of Territorial Integrity?. International Journal of Baltic Law. Vytautas Magnus University School of Law. ‘under Resolution 2625(XXV) as under Resolution 1514 (XV), “a people” can be defined as the entire population of a territorial unit. Thus, both resolutions preclude ethnic groups within non-self-governing territories from being considered as “peoples”.’

   [↪]

4. Maʻoz, M. (2002). Middle Eastern Minorities and Diasporas. Sussex Academic Press. ‘Documents published about the San Francisco Conference in 1945 reveal that those who drafted the UN Charter, which declares “the right of all peoples to self-determination,” did not support self-determination by secession . There was an understanding that the right to self-determination conformed to the purposes of the Charter “only insofar as it implied the right of self-government of peoples and not the right of secession.”44 The 1960 UN Declaration on the Granting of independence to Colonial Countries talked about “the right of self-determination of all peoples,” but regarded it as incompatible with the UN Charter to discuss “any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country’

   [↪]

5. Lauterpacht, E., Greenwood, C. (1999). International Law Reports. Cambridge University Press. ‘as a formal source of international law pursuant to Article 38 (c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. Secession is deemed to be a most serious crime by the national legislations of civilized nations. More particularly, an inside assault on the territorial integrity of a country or an attempted assault, including preparatory actions, are categorized as one of the gravest of crimes in virtually all the criminal codes of civilized nations.’

   [↪]

6. Sarnoff, I. (1997). International Instruments of the United Nations. United Nations Publications. ‘refrain from any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and territorial integrity of any other State or country.’ [↪]