Fakes 3; the BBC is good but for the people of Iran

According to documents published Wikileaks site The Government of England, along with u.s. intelligence agencies, Israel, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and even the curator is supporting separatism in Iran (This entry To see all the manabash.). According to the CIA's diplomatic lomond you in addition to the direct support, spending millions of dollars, in the name of human rights and human rights organizations do; so it shouldn't be surprising to know much of those active as a human rights activist and supporter of the rights of ethnic minorities to their own wormholes; where are financing.
The last few years is that the country's State organs, the BBC uk, a part with the name of "observers say has created a Web site in English and some of the well known ' pen in it?. Despite being a BBC Persian tv I do not have access, but the most shamelessly the most ugly and anti-Iranian on the same content a few years of the BBC Persian website I read. Work somewhere that even Iran's legal basis for the hands and feet; while the right is called the right of secession in the form of self-determination is an absolutely shameless lie. The continuation of this policy led to a separate part of my blog henceforward I created to pay these fakes and thmetha posts.

BBC Persian has repeatedly defended a right called the right to self-determination of nations to the extent of the disintegration of Iran on its website (For example here Or here) and in its television programs.. I have previously written about the fact that the BBC is responsible for these articles and comments.. The BBC curates its article writers and often removes opposing views, although there have been instances where at least comments were published; however, undoubtedly, the content published by this media reflects its viewpoints.. Regarding the fact that the right to self-determination in no way means the right to separatism or the violation of a country's legal sovereignty, I have explained in detail before.

Today, an article from the BBC website was published that strongly condemns the violation of Ukraine's national sovereignty by Russian forces. From the perspective of public international law, considering that Crimea is part of Ukraine, this region has no right to request annexation to another country or to request a referendum to determine the legal status of this area.:

…The fact that the Crimea region is administratively subject to a specific system does not grant this area of Ukraine any rights to make decisions on matters that have sovereign aspects..
The existence of an ethnic-linguistic minority or majority in any part of a country cannot provide a basis in international law for these individuals to decide on sovereignty over their region..

…”The author rightly points out that the bullying behavior of the Russian government and the illegal referendum conducted for the disintegration of Ukraine in part of it has no legal basis.”

In other words, neither Russia nor any other country can issue a decree for the disintegration of an independent country based on elections in part of a country and for political reckoning with the West.. That is the same camp to which the BBC belongs.–However, for those who have followed the television network's programs and the BBC website over the past years and read such content, the question inevitably arises: where have these international and legal laws been in recent years?– Was it that when the BBC invited known separatists as guests on its Persian programs or website to find legal justifications for the disintegration of Iran or, as they call it, the independence of oppressed nations, these laws had not been formulated, or did the BBC not know that inviting these individuals specifically labeled as separatists. as those who have international crimes?–As those who have international crimes–و دخالت در امور مربوط به تمامیت ارضی یک کشور دیگر جرم است؟ آیا جز این است که چنین رفتاری را باید نشانگر تزویر دانست؟ آیا آن زمان که مجری برنامه ساز بی بی سی Called Iran a fake country.a country that at least 2500 The year has a recorded history and at least 1600 A year ago, it was called by this name, was the national sovereignty of this independent country not respected? Perhaps we should recall that old proverb once again that: Death is good, but for the neighbor..