Libraries and کتابسوزی in Iran
I do not intend to abuse. But in English, such as when a comma between the two and nothing like pronouns (when ) There are two such are connected and put them together without interruption--. (A Google search for relative clause)
The sentence in the introduction to this book is:
The intellectual sciences are said to have come to the Greeks from the Persians, when Alexander killed Darius and gained control of the Achemenid empire.

If you notice. In the original text of the book, the word (when) Start with small letters (Instead of w W) That show is still the middle of the sentence. Therefore, it must translate the two sentences to read connected. That is, the

“Said to be the intellectual Sciences, when Alexander the Achaemenid Empire of Darius and control into the hands of the Iranians, Greeks.”

Libraries and کتابسوزی in Iran
ضمنا این را هم اضافه کنم که دانشنامه‌ای که شما به آن اشاره کرده اید برای بخش کتابخانه‌های ایران مشکلاتی داشته اند

In many cases we
could not find appropriate authors and in other cases we did have a contract with an
author or a team of authors who had to withdraw from the project at a time when it
was much too late to find a replacement (e.g. Argentina, Egypt, Italy, Lebanon,
Portugal, New Zealand, Iran, Iraq, South Africa and Russia).
pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/pdf/Introduction.pdf

Libraries and کتابسوزی in Iran
My question about Ibn Khaldun that you said at the beginning of your article you brought:
"The Iranians were significant on massive shiohai aghli balom offered ... This science after the country's culture and on the Alexandra, having overcome kianian Iranian has decreased from ionanian "

The letter I is what can be found in the word for this? While you tell yourself ارسطاطلیس (Aristotle) Is the age of Alexander the great and everyone knows that the intellectual Sciences already than Aristotle in Greece had reached to the attainment.

The BBC's response to the Iranian people is race;
hello

You are spiral or iranic?

The book burnings, the Arabs in Iran.
-About whether words such as “The legend of” And “Folk” What is the weight of the scientific literature on do not talk with you and make it honorable WA vocalists. In the case of کتابسوزی of Alexandria Western writers enough time to fake being the appointment of Arabs to speak and I have driven most do not see a reason to explain the. If someone was interested in stay can be read here:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria

I say in the letter of St. کامنتم, but because you've referred to, like the question in my mind that motahari created for you and the readers of my books,:

How might the intellectual Sciences, according to Ibn Khaldun, fresh after the attack of Alexander the Iranians, Greeks, while everyone knows Alexander and Aristotle both were age and Greece at the time of much earlier in the intellectual Sciences flourish?

Mattresses "radio zamaneh scandal that has fallen from the roof of the long-awaited"
http://www.orinst.ox.ac.uk/staff/iw/hkatouzian.html

position: Faculty Member
in oriental studies

The book burnings, the Arabs in Iran.
دکتر فرانز رزنتال، استاد دانشگاه ییل در ذیل جمله نقل شده توسط ابن خلدون در پاورقی این کتاب می‌‌نویسد[1.]:

This is a variant of the famous legend according to which, Umar ordered the destruction of the
celebrated library in Alexandria

به دیگر سخن، او این گفته ابن خلدون را که خلیفه دوم دستور به سوزاندن کتاب‌های ایرانیان داد، را کپی‌ برداری از “افسانه مشهور” سوزاندن کتابخانه اسکندریه توسط مسلمانان می‌‌داند.

کلی ترامبل، نویسنده کتاب “کتابخانه اسکندریه” بر این باور است که اکثر دانشوران امروزی داستان تخریب کتابخانه اسکندریه به دست مسلمانان را نا معتبر می‌‌دانند[2.]:

Today most scholars have discredited the story of the destruction of the Library by the Muslims

دکتر برنارد لوییس، استاد دانشگاه پرینستون، در مقاله‌ای دلایل خود را بر جعلی بودن کتابسوزی اسکندریه مصر توسط اعراب ارائه می‌‌کند و به ریشه یابی‌ به وجود آمدن چنین ادعائی می‌‌پردازد. او با اشاره به شباهت روایت ابن خلدون در دستور عمر به سوزاندن کتاب‌های ایرانیان با دستوری که از وی در سوزاندن کتابخانه اسکندریه نقل می‌‌شود نتیجه می‌‌گیرد که این هر دو ادعا از جنس باور‌های عامیانه هستند[3.]:

The 14th century historian Ibn Khaldun tells an almost identical story concerning the destruction of a library in Persia, also by order of the Caliph ‘Umar, thus demonstrating its folkloric character

متیو بتلز، استاد دانشگاه هاروارد در کتاب “Library: تاریخی‌ پر سرو صدا” ریشه افسانه کتابسوزی اسکندریه را چنین می‌‌نگارد[4.]:

the story as we know it may have been invented by one Ibn al-Qifti, a twelfth century Sunni chronicler. According to the Egyptian classicist, Mostafa el-Abbadi, al-Qifti may have invented the story to justify the sale of books by the twelfth-cntury Sunni ruler Sladin, who sold off whole libraries to pay off his fight against the Crusaders.

Resources

1. The Muqaddimah, an introduction to history By Ibn Khaldun, translated by Franz Rosenthal, p. 373 قابل دسترسی‌ در اینجا
books.google.com/books?id=FlNZ5w … nt&f=false

2. Kelly Trumble, The Library of Alexandria, Robina MacIntyre Marshall, p. 51, قابل دسترسی‌ در اینجا
books.google.com/books?id=-qvIyv … ed&f=false

3. Lewis, Bernard. “The Vanished Library”. The New York Review of Books. 37(14). 27 September 1990قابل دسترسی‌ در اینجا
nybooks.com/articles/3517

4. Library: an Unquite History By Matthew Battles, قابل دسترسی‌ در اینجا
books.google.com/books?id=L5O-v2 … ti&f=false