The Muslim Afghan, Palestinian and left namslman concerned

School for Afghan children

Thirty-three years of the life of the Islamic regime, enmity and malice of the system than to the country of Israel as the guiding principle and لایتغیر داکترین Iran's foreign policy, and the stakes for the nation of Iran was گرفتاریهای the frequency. In fact no one can deny, Islamic Republic of – Which claims to defend the rights of the people, "Palestine" and other Muslims of the world – In all these years to defend the Palestinian groups and Israel supporters رودروی this country – The great centers of power and wealth in the world are present – And the cost of money it is paved on the Iranian nation.

This confrontation has always been entitled to defend the rights of Muslims in Palestine, but ستمدیده can be done in system behavior facing the Muslim people of Afghanistan, including other Muslims, serious doubts on the goals of the system and claim oppression creates its heads of anti.

Muslim Palestinians

The people of Palestine are oppressed and defenseless people who, after the establishment of the state of Israel and the passing of the United Nations resolution of the year 1948 have suffered great oppression. Their lands were confiscated in several stages, and Israel is still building settlements on the remainder of them; their national sovereignty was taken away, and they were displaced from their ancestral homeland; but this issue – contrary to what Jewish and Muslim extremists claim (each for different reasons) – جوهره ی مذهبی ندارد و اساسا یک دعوای حقوقی بر سر مالکیت زمین است که اگر تا امروز فراتر از ملاحظات مذهبی و ایدئولوژیک و صرفا بر پایه حق مالکیت طرفین پی گیری شده بود، احتمالا بیش از نیم قرن درگیری و کشاکش را به منطقه تحمیل نمی کرد و وضعیت خاورمیانه هم به بن بست کنونی نمی رسید.

Over the past decades, among all Arab and Muslim countries in the region, Iran is probably the only Muslim country that has consistently defended Palestinian groups against Israel.. The other countries have always had a sporadic presence in this arena, and perhaps for the sake of their own interests, they have turned a blind eye to many facts.. Nevertheless, this Palestinian friendship of the leaders of the Islamic Republic also has no logical justification, because if this country needed to play a role in securing the rights of Palestinians, this intervention should have been carried out with due regard for national interests and as part of the international community or at least Muslim countries, and not in the current form, which has today, after several decades, turned Iran into an isolated country and constantly exposes us to the risk of foreign military attack..

It should be noted that Palestinians are not the only Muslim people who are collectively oppressed; in Iran's neighborhood, the Russians have harassed the Chechen people for years, and the Chinese violate the rights of the Muslim minority in that country, but neither of these countries has ever faced a hostile reaction from the Islamic regime; there is not even a single instance where the mullahs' regime has protested the killing of Muslims in these cases.. Given that protesting or even being hostile to China and Russia is far less costly than engaging with Israel's Jewish supporters, who presumably hold a large portion of the world's political and economic power, the root of these policies and enmities should not be sought in the regime leaders' love of Islam, but elsewhere..

در واقع هدف نظام اسلامی از درگیری با اسراییل، هیچگاه حفظ منافع فلسطینیان یا دفاع از حقوق مسلمانان نبوده بلکه چون افکار عمومی جهان عرب نسبت به مسئله فلسطینیان حساس تر است و آقایان هم به دنبال جای پا در کشورهای عرب منطقه هستند، این بساط را تعمدا در منطقه علم کردند تو بتوانند برای خود مشروعیتی دست و پا کنند و در داخل و خارج از کشور توجیحی برای حیات سیاسی خود داشته باشند. A very good example to confirm this claim is the inhumane and discriminatory behavior of the Islamic regime towards Afghan citizens.

Non-Muslim Afghans

Unlike some Palestinian groups and The Arab League who have the blood of the Iranian nation on their hands and officially supported the aggressor forces in various ways during Saddam Hussein's invasion of Iran, the people of Afghanistan have never participated in any national war against the people of Iran.. In fact, Afghanistan – most of which until the late 19th century was part of Iran – is itself the biggest victim of internal and sectarian wars, and this issue has led to the migration of a large number of its citizens to our homeland over the past decades..

Almost since the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, millions of Afghan refugees have poured into Iran.. The migration of this group has had various consequences for both sides; Afghans have always complained about the behavior of their Iranian hosts, and Iranians have demanded the departure of millions of Afghans, some estimates of whom put them at 5 millions of migrants also estimates. but this issue has recently taken on other dimensions and sidelines .

During Nowruz this year, the Isfahan Governorate announced that Afghan citizens were prohibited from entering Soffeh Park in that city for the Sizdah Bedar ceremony.. Subsequently, some tourist cities in Iran were also declared "Afghan-free zones" by local officials and the governorates of those areas.. حتی از جانب یک مرجع پزشکی اعلام شده که «پیوند عضو ایرانی به افاغنه ممکن نیست.» این نوع محدودیتها که ظاهرا برای حفظ آرامش و امنیت مردم بومی اعمال می شود علاوه بر اینکه بسیار توهین آمیز است، در اغلب موارد می تواند تاثیر معکوس بگذارد و موجبات تنفر و شکاف میان مردم میزبان و مهمانان افغانیشان شود. Recently, news also came from Yazd that following the rape of a Yazd girl by several Afghan nationals, the homes of several hundred Afghan immigrants were set on fire.. از اینها می توان نتیجه گرفت که با توجه به وضعیت مهاجران افغان و سو مدیریت مسئولان جمهوری اسلامی – who, instead of solving problems, mostly fuel group and ethnic hatred, – we should expect more unfortunate incidents of this kind..

تبعیض ها

Afghan refugees residing in Iran, even if they have lived in this country for years, do not enjoy the civil rights of an Iranian, and this very issue always places them in the position of second and third-class citizens.. Also, in many cases, Afghan citizens are not allowed to work, which creates opportunities for employers to exploit them; Afghan children do not have the right to education or access to educational facilities.. Recently, a government authority in Iran also claimed that selling food to Afghan nationals is prohibited, or that any Iranian can, at their discretion, ask an Afghan for an ID card, which is itself a matter – if true, – The depth of immaturity and ignorance of the government's officials shows the system.

Cultural and social abnormalities

Some Iranians who oppose the presence of Afghans in Iran claim that, according to evidence, moral corruption, violence, and lawlessness are common characteristics among Afghan nationals, and that these Afghan guests are in many cases responsible for infringing upon the rights of Iranian citizens and for social anomalies..

Without a doubt, decades of civil war, displacement, destruction, corruption, and authoritarianism leave deep cultural impacts on any human society, and this very issue will be the cause of many misfortunes and anomalies.. The people of Afghanistan are no exception to this rule, and naturally, the behavior of this group cannot be evaluated in the same way as a society that has not experienced similar living conditions..

Despite all these details, it must be understood that the presence of Afghan nationals in Iran is an undeniable fact, and no one can deny it based on personal preference.. اگر مسئولین جمهوری اسلامی و اتباع ایرانی هم به دنبال حل مشکلات ناشی از حضور این گروه در ایران هستند، باید هرچه بیشتر در جهت رفع تبعیض ها گام بردارند. دسترسی رایگان به امکانات آموزشی، آموزش فراگیر و ایجاد شرایط عادلانه برای تصدی مشاغل قانونی که امکان تامین معاش شرافتمندانه را فراهم کند، احتمالا راهگشای برخی از مشکلات کنونی خواهد بود.

Leftist creditors

Recently, several articles (Mainly from the left spectrum) Were published on Persian websites that consider nationalist tendencies and Iranian nationalism responsible for the current situation of Afghan citizens in Iran. For example Faraj Sarkouhi TP_12: writes on the BBC Persian website:

Some analysts consider "self-abasement towards Europeans and Americans and self-aggrandizement towards Afghans, Arabs, and Turks" as indicators of the dominant, though not universal, collective mind and psychology among Iranians, and as stable components of the prevailing culture, not subcultures, in Iran, and they explain the discriminatory behavior of certain segments of the population towards Afghan immigrants on this basis..

Mr. Sarkouhi, of course, has not provided any names or addresses of these "some analysts," who are probably his like-minded friends; however, the translation of this statement is probably that Farsi speakers or Persian speakers, – who represent the dominant culture in Iran, – exhibit such discriminatory behavior; whereas other subcultures and Iranian ethnic groups do not behave in this way, while the author does not consider that in all areas where Iranian ethnic groups with those subcultures reside, the presence of Afghan nationals is prohibited.! For example, Afghans are not allowed to reside in any of the Azeri-speaking or Kurdish-speaking provinces of Iran, and if there is no interaction, how can Faraj Sarkouhi or those "some analysts" judge whether it is discriminatory or not?

In fact, provincial authorities in Azeri-speaking regions were the first group to officially ban the presence of Afghan nationals.. Currently, except for the three provinces of Tehran, Qom, and Alborz, where Afghans have the right to reside in all areas, in the remaining provinces, only specific areas have been designated for them, and these are mostly in Farsi-speaking areas or, as Sarkouhi puts it, the "dominant culture.".

Of course, Faraj Sarkohi himself goes on to say:

There is no field research to prove or disprove this perception, but its adherents not only refer to various and repeated examples of speech and behavior arising from this mentality and psychology in government institutions and among various layers of people, but also to the silence of many Iranian intellectuals in the face of such behaviors, to the presence of the illusion of Iranian superiority in many past and contemporary literary and artistic works, to the prevalence of derogatory jokes against minorities and immigrants, to the unwritten prohibition of Afghan and Iraqi immigrants entering family and friendship networks, and to the common image of Afghans, Arabs, and Turks in the collective consciousness of the majority as reasons to confirm their perception..

Many Persian-speaking Iranians look down not only on their neighbors and immigrants, but also on their non-Persian-speaking compatriots..

It is better for Mr. Sarkohi not to raise such issues, whose speaker is "some analysts" and who himself admits that there is no evidence for their correctness..

He also claims:

Some extremist nationalists consider the Persian language and some Islamists consider the Shia religion to be the unifying and superior factor of Iranians, but a significant portion of Iranians speak languages other than Persian and a significant portion of Iranians are Sunni..

Extremist Iranian nationalists also consider themselves heirs of ancient Iran, which they believe was superior to other cultures and civilizations..

Or

Promoting the illusion of Iranian superiority over Turks and Arabs is one of the main themes of Ferdowsi's Shahnameh.. The Shahnameh was created at a time when Arabs had overthrown the Sasanian Empire, and Arab caliphs ruled over one part of Iran, and Turkic dynasties ruled over another..

In fact, these friends are neither thinking about solving the problems of the unfortunate people of Afghanistan, nor do they have any knowledge of the roots of the hostilities, nor do they offer any solution to this predicament.. Their goal in raising such issues is merely to vent their frustrations and they are looking for an opportunity to settle their historical scores. Otherwise, any fair-minded person who is aware of the issue would admit that the current situation of Afghan immigrants in Iran is a result of the discriminatory laws of the Islamic regime, and any label that has been attached to the Islamic Republic and its rulers in the past thirty-three years is not nationalism..