English reading fake or Cyrus ' analysis site us nonsense noose?
Hello dear friend. I'm somewhere in this post refer to Latinos didn't reference. The Roman Catholic Church or the same language, Latin, old English, and a language other than. But let paskht give an example with the. You can't beat the red lights when driving you rejected solely because the local resources and the location of the رسیدی that have been invented from scratch red lights بدردنخوری. As the highway instead of unilateral power, not two-sided driving Kenny because the reasons for the rules about being a significant Highway,. It may be the intention and the red lights with hand declines you or the intentions of the highway's entry ban on; but even in such a situation you should know the rules and then you breach.

If you write something you must first learn the alphabet writing graft. Theory and the theory of processing both in history and in all there are ways of. This is the way you and I can not confirm and reject, but we can learn. Anything that is outside of these methods and to claim that it is scientific, Soddo science (Pseudo-Science) Is. اینکاری is also the Islamic Republic; anything that does not look at the humanities and social sciences away and claims that there are better methods to identify or to quote you with people of the place to the agreement reached.

Whether you write for me: “If you want a source of English (Preferably the Encyclopedia Britannica!) The proof of that is the shape of the triangular land, for example,! Its acceptance to the audience will not be far from the mind of khastan.” This shows that you do not drive down the. Because if you were you would know that such a thing is not possible دانستی.

This is just one more post I. In this entry I'm not supposed to be just something of the history of the world I change. As the article is just a lower entry site. More just write for the general public and academic content merely to a few academic experts. To change the understanding of a historical event, you must write a standard academic entry and this entry after being written and ریویو a long way to go until that change something. For this purpose is first of all principles and rules of my long workday must you let. I read the story as more academic rabeldm bldem. So I can I drive in your neighborhood, even though according to geographical shmaatlaaat and anthropology and Linguistics does not have to be accurate since it is already in the neighborhood, or I did not drive.

For the general public or those who are expert in a field of reliable sources is not merely an encyclopedia articles are. It does not matter that the encyclopedia in English or Hindi or English or Latin is Capella; but the encyclopedia should be valid. You refer to secondary sources other than the General instead and don't give you the citation tertiary. If the field research scientists to prove something--German fi thread enters a specialized academic books and encyclopedia articles will be. If it is not, which means this RFC is that it is the German scientists did not prove something or maybe they weren't at all German scientists and a number of authors دوستکار(Amateur) Who were like me and you were merely subject to interest.

Of the actions of the Iranian Shiites: The Kaaba and the black stone wall ruin turn to rock the toilet bowl
The toilet is the mouth of the one who pushed you to lower the average IQ of Iranians!
Muslim! Momen! Retarded! Illiterate! Somebody's for 20 years. / Urinating in the stone of al-Aswad, you have also paid your life for hajj pilgrimage to be filled with a toilet bowl stone; what is my crime? I just got the point، and I left the source.. Go to the Gospel of God and ask God to give you a piece of stone.. Then kiss me with a big kiss.!

(With two years of delay, this user has a broken mouth.!)

Of the actions of the Iranian Shiites: The Kaaba and the black stone wall ruin turn to rock the toilet bowl
A book published by an academic publication, such as Yale University, which is an expert in this field, is called a reliable source.! Instead of writing three times what you believe and what you don't believe, look at the source and the content once..

Insult to Cyrus the great in University of Tabriz
This "knowing" of you and your kind has made me one in these fourteen – Fifteen years when I was familiar with you, the beasts perished.!
of course, i have to admit, i still don't understand what this "turk" means to you.! You know enough, and then you have done the same thing..

The reasons for 50 tons of the most prominent scientists in the world who do not believe in the existence of God or religion properly

To believe in the existence or absence of God, no scientific or evidence or any trial is accountable for your questions.. It only depends on the understanding of thoughtful humans..

If you are not accountable to any scientific, evidence and trial, then what are the mastermind people to understand? How coordinated the perception of "mastermind people" is not based on testing, science, or evidence. How can thinking and perceptual be considered valid but not on the basis of any reasons?

However, I believe that God would deny my mother's mercy to me, and I have come to my own womb and evolve.

Your opinion is not important because we are talking about your intentions. Objective/Objective issues such as the emergence of people from the mother's womb or the evolution of issues related to the world are material and their authenticity with evidence and testing is proved. The opinion of people is related to the subjects.

That says 《 you, even if the world is made, does not cause god 》 and I must say that your opinion is completely non-منطقیه. I'm going to create a car that we now have, without getting to the hands of someone gradually.. Or a more vivid example of the not that you do not turn into any plant, so that one should get a grown-up to grow up but that plant cannot understand and realize you.. Because the world of plants is different.

My article I wrote for another user (I guess this post or post "Irdat" Mulla Sadra) Was that if we assume the world before the Big Bang, this is not necessarily the cause of God, while this assumption is a big assumption that before the Big Bang was not the time to be causation.. This type of curative deduction is fake. If we say because we do not know anything, then it is not necessarily God, then the "God of the holes" because they don't do something we can't get the desired result..
About the genesis of creatures is a different situation. We are certainly aware of the complexity of the evolution and the natural selection arise (Objective/Objective) That does not require smart creation..

Here's how I explained:

https://farda.us/?p=4743

Iran's expulsion of the Imam
Hello

Before we get to the definition of ignorance, these two images are both photoshopped.. So that your image is not deleted and others will know what we're talking about in the future and don't click on your link (It's not safe.!) i'll put a copy of your image here:

Please pay attention.: Photoshop images can be identified by certain software, and these two images are both photoshopped.. This means that the description may have been photoshopped in the first image, in the second image the brick was added to the wall or added to the first image of the panel for the second explanation..

But It doesn't matter.! In order to understand the ignorance you are referring to, it doesn't matter which image is photoshopped.. Even in the image you sent, the guy holding the letter put it in the well.–That his 1,200-year-old Imam, who beed imam at the age of five and broke his seven-year-old grandfather's record in his Shiite imamate,– Sing, it's the same as ignorance..

If for any reason he doubts the existence of a person with the identity of the Imam of time
Or you don't believe that you're providing evidence from written sources or documents.

You (And your like-minded people.) You have an unusual claim (extraordinary claim) About the 1,200-year-old Imam and his well that you are obliged to bring proof of the authenticity of your claimi'm not obliged to show against your claim.