How the Ayatollah were taught to the theory of relativity Einstein
Einstein did not believe God (In a separate article, I described with a credible quote from Princeton and Oxford Publications.)Espinosa Pan Teaist (All the gods that are absolutely different from the personal God, with character and will) Was The Lord is Kant also showed Descartes in the.

All of this does not show that God is not. That it is fallacious to fame to prove the existence or lack of God is a fallacy called: Appeal to Authority

While on this site I see, Hawking is about God's existence that I must say the wall of experimental science is shorter than talking about metaphysical's issues..

Hawking is a merealist. It is one of the people who resort to a material world interactions not to be a paranormal argument.. In the view of Hawking, there's no metaphysical looking to look at it..

Science is helpless in proving the presence of molecules, atoms, photon and subatomic particles.

This phrase is a fallacy called Science doesnt know everything. If the existence of God for the reasons of the world is like the first cause is in the scope of science.

Therefore, the revocation concepts of popper, explaining the coherence and the principle of research positinism have been proposed as metaphysical's concepts of faith.

Lenovo! Principles such as the patability of the unseen or the rules of the knowledge of science in dealing with the material phenomena of the world is a material that is considered as a sign of proof of God if you proven the MSDAGHSH.

If science was proven, no ideas mentioned above impossible

It is a proof of science or sciences, but not all scientific theories are at a much of a level that is outside the debate, but if the category is not scientifically proven. Anything that is methodical, repeatable and tested.

If you bring a material for God's existence, you cannot escape the scientific method.. You also mentioned that it is a مادیگرا that for the first reason Allah has physical and material reasons..

How the Ayatollah were taught to the theory of relativity Einstein
The problem you have but this is at best, dont dont know what you talking about!

Firstly, where censored جقایق that you amarsh you sure as to the size of his 90 percent of censorship? The comments section is open and everyone will be whatever you (Except for vulgar words فخاشی that automatically will be removed and the contents of the جانک/jfang) Writes. But on the other side of Internet amelh and soldiers of Imam Khamenei opposition voices of any kind of censorship and twenty-chharsaath each of their elaborate Chinese and Russian comrades were remembered only that this will remove a window for this censorship;.

But we've gotten to that I should "hear the verses of the Qur'an I violate science». In the Qur'an verse one is not necessarily the scientific and specifically a scientific phenomenon to predict. When we say do not necessarily mfahomsh this is where you make the argument that you raised and assumptions is necessarily given it and the arguments desired result be achieved, nor that you interpret yourself write a verse and you claim that PHI lalmthl it's the same quantum theory or the theory of verse by a certain General There has been the first foreign رلتیویتی do not swear; i.e. no scientific and scholarly written document a scientific profile is not in the Quran. According to the foot of the pulpit the mullahs is good, but beyond that no application.

Anything that is not in the scope of the physical world (Paranormal phenomena like the world after death, the soul or the existence of God, likewise,) The possibility of Falsifiability because it basically is not a purely physical phenomenon in the world contained in the physical world can be an annulment (falsify) *. To reject the Qur'an but not necessary all to his annulment is enough to show just one of the claims (Such as the story of Adam and Eve) Can't be true–To assume that to ابزاراتی because the interpretation of religious هرمنیاتیک//draw means us resort–Then this book is the word of the creator in the world cannot.

Of the actions of the Iranian Shiites: The Kaaba and the black stone wall ruin turn to rock the toilet bowl
The toilet is the mouth of the one who pushed you to lower the average IQ of Iranians!
Muslim! Momen! Retarded! Illiterate! Somebody's for 20 years. / Urinating in the stone of al-Aswad, you have also paid your life for hajj pilgrimage to be filled with a toilet bowl stone; what is my crime? I just got the point، and I left the source.. Go to the Gospel of God and ask God to give you a piece of stone.. Then kiss me with a big kiss.!

(With two years of delay, this user has a broken mouth.!)

Of the actions of the Iranian Shiites: The Kaaba and the black stone wall ruin turn to rock the toilet bowl
A book published by an academic publication, such as Yale University, which is an expert in this field, is called a reliable source.! Instead of writing three times what you believe and what you don't believe, look at the source and the content once..

Insult to Cyrus the great in University of Tabriz
This "knowing" of you and your kind has made me one in these fourteen – Fifteen years when I was familiar with you, the beasts perished.!
of course, i have to admit, i still don't understand what this "turk" means to you.! You know enough, and then you have done the same thing..

The reasons for 50 tons of the most prominent scientists in the world who do not believe in the existence of God or religion properly

To believe in the existence or absence of God, no scientific or evidence or any trial is accountable for your questions.. It only depends on the understanding of thoughtful humans..

If you are not accountable to any scientific, evidence and trial, then what are the mastermind people to understand? How coordinated the perception of "mastermind people" is not based on testing, science, or evidence. How can thinking and perceptual be considered valid but not on the basis of any reasons?

However, I believe that God would deny my mother's mercy to me, and I have come to my own womb and evolve.

Your opinion is not important because we are talking about your intentions. Objective/Objective issues such as the emergence of people from the mother's womb or the evolution of issues related to the world are material and their authenticity with evidence and testing is proved. The opinion of people is related to the subjects.

That says 《 you, even if the world is made, does not cause god 》 and I must say that your opinion is completely non-منطقیه. I'm going to create a car that we now have, without getting to the hands of someone gradually.. Or a more vivid example of the not that you do not turn into any plant, so that one should get a grown-up to grow up but that plant cannot understand and realize you.. Because the world of plants is different.

My article I wrote for another user (I guess this post or post "Irdat" Mulla Sadra) Was that if we assume the world before the Big Bang, this is not necessarily the cause of God, while this assumption is a big assumption that before the Big Bang was not the time to be causation.. This type of curative deduction is fake. If we say because we do not know anything, then it is not necessarily God, then the "God of the holes" because they don't do something we can't get the desired result..
About the genesis of creatures is a different situation. We are certainly aware of the complexity of the evolution and the natural selection arise (Objective/Objective) That does not require smart creation..

Here's how I explained:

https://farda.us/?p=4743

Iran's expulsion of the Imam
Hello

Before we get to the definition of ignorance, these two images are both photoshopped.. So that your image is not deleted and others will know what we're talking about in the future and don't click on your link (It's not safe.!) i'll put a copy of your image here:

Please pay attention.: Photoshop images can be identified by certain software, and these two images are both photoshopped.. This means that the description may have been photoshopped in the first image, in the second image the brick was added to the wall or added to the first image of the panel for the second explanation..

But It doesn't matter.! In order to understand the ignorance you are referring to, it doesn't matter which image is photoshopped.. Even in the image you sent, the guy holding the letter put it in the well.–That his 1,200-year-old Imam, who beed imam at the age of five and broke his seven-year-old grandfather's record in his Shiite imamate,– Sing, it's the same as ignorance..

If for any reason he doubts the existence of a person with the identity of the Imam of time
Or you don't believe that you're providing evidence from written sources or documents.

You (And your like-minded people.) You have an unusual claim (extraordinary claim) About the 1,200-year-old Imam and his well that you are obliged to bring proof of the authenticity of your claimi'm not obliged to show against your claim.