Feed
SSL
My YouTube
Long Ernest Hemingway said:: All thinkers are godless! Even if the idea of Hemingway's indulgence, therefore must accept that even sectors are godless. Almost all of the winners of the Nobel Prize and the greater part of the world's most prominent scientists and thinkers are skeptical of the existence of God and this is even before it is provided to the existence of prophets, Angels, or demons, or ajanh, an imam and a few hundred thousand years have believed the absent. Knowing the importance of this issue is such that the دیدگاههایی in Iran or other Islamic societies like Saudi Arabia deal with security and even face the death penalty would be. Therefore, when faced with such charges (Like the death penalty for Insult to the father of the gpeto) You must know what the extent of cognitive science and uncertainty we face:
I have all the argument proving the existence of God reviews and got none of them valid in terms of the logical نیافتم. – Bertrand Russell, winning literary Nobel (Minutes 9.:00)
Most scientists are godless; a few numbers less than ten percent believe in the existence of God. Among the major scientists, more than 90 percent are godless. They are the various aspects of their daily lives danshshan to move up. This does not mean that I am unwilling to not just the mystical topics can I accept them. – Harold کروتو, winner of the Nobel Prize in chemistry (Min 20:30)
Religious belief is truly science consume and how much good that does such. – Steven Weinberg, winner of the Nobel Prize in physics (33 minutes:30)
Belief in the existence of God is the introduction to belief in other principles and rules. In our country, in addition to being a belief in the existence of God is accepted as a principle, belief in a God that has representatives; the prophets and chosen by him to have been the Mission of the Mission of the Shiite imams to believe; that the generation of the Prophet's successors, and the generation of Enduro belief that clerics and velayat-e Faqih has a successor and Deputy are both imams to enter the rest of the necessary political and social arenas and in all cases the existence of God As an undeniable principle approved by the community, the introduction is to accept the political and economic principles that other regulations based on it has been based on the.
This video is a collection of the most outstanding اظهارنظرهای fifty tons of thinkers and scientists about God and religion, which are briefly explain that story in the U.S..
Interviewees in order of display:
Lawrence Krauss, World-Renowned Physicist
Robert Coleman Richardson, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Richard Feynman, World-Renowned Physicist, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Simon Blackburn, Cambridge Professor of Philosophy
Colin Blakemore, World-Renowned Oxford Professor of Neuroscience
Steven Pinker, World-Renowned Harvard Professor of Psychology
Alan Guth, World-Renowned MIT Professor of Physics
Noam Chomsky, World-Renowned MIT Professor of Linguistics
Nicolaas Bloembergen, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Peter Atkins, World-Renowned Oxford Professor of Chemistry
Oliver Sacks, World-Renowned Neurologist, Columbia University
Lord Martin Rees, Astronomer Royal
Sir John Gurdon, Pioneering Developmental Biologist, Cambridge
Sir Bertrand Russell, World-Renowned Philosopher, Nobel Laureate
Stephen Hawking, World-Renowned Cambridge Theoretical Physicist
Riccardo Giacconi, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Ned Block, NYU Professor of Philosophy
Gerard ‘t Hooft, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Marcus du Sautoy, Oxford Professor of Mathematics
James Watson, Co-discoverer of DNA, Nobel Laureate
Colin McGinn, Professor of Philosophy, Miami University
Sir Patrick Bateson, Cambridge Professor of Ethology
Sir David Attenborough, World-Renowned Broadcaster and Naturalist
Martinus Veltman, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Pascal Boyer, Professor of Anthropology
Partha Dasgupta, Cambridge Professor of Economics
AC Grayling, Birkbeck Professor of Philosophy
Ivar Giaever, Nobel Laureate in Physics
John Searle, Berkeley Professor of Philosophy
Brian Cox, Particle Physicist (Large Hadron Collider, CERN)
Herbert Kroemer, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Rebecca Goldstein, Professor of Philosophy
Michael Tooley, Professor of Philosophy, Colorado
Sir Harold Kroto, Nobel Laureate in Chemistry
Leonard Susskind, Stanford Professor of Theoretical Physics
Quentin Skinner, Professor of History (Cambridge)
Theodor W. Hänsch, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Mark Balaguer, CSU Professor of Philosophy
Richard Ernst, Nobel Laureate in Chemistry
Alan Macfarlane, Cambridge Professor of Anthropology
Professor Neil deGrasse Tyson, Princeton Research Scientist
Douglas Osheroff, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Hubert Dreyfus, Berkeley Professor of Philosophy
Lord Colin Renfrew, World-Renowned Archaeologist, Cambridge
Carl Sagan, World-Renowned Astronomer
Peter Singer, World-Renowned Bioethicist, Princeton
Rudolph Marcus, Nobel Laureate in Chemistry
Robert Foley, Cambridge Professor of Human Evolution
Daniel Dennett, Tufts Professor of Philosophy
Steven Weinberg, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Download file
- This documentary is accompanied by subtitles Through this address The helpdesk.
- If you simply need subtitles, the subtitle file alone Of this address Get.
A few tips that might help
- To watch a video file to an FLV file player, which has the capability to play, need. If you do not have such a program, Who is my player program Good program (For Pocket computers) And offers that possibility to watch almost all of formet video gives you the.
- If the Internet download speed is low, you can use the Download Manager program like program "J Downloader» Use.
- If you are using the Windows operating system and then download the subtitle file, you see the letters in illegible; from within the Windows Control Panel, in the section Appearance and Personalization On the date the option یChange, time, or number formats Click the window Administrative The option Change system locale And then Persian Choose a time and turn on the device will fix this problem.
Piracy is prohibited!
Any cut of me and the other person's name with a re-release in plagiarism (plagiarism) And piracy is clear in days. I didn't respond today to this issue but my Creative Commons license written with the name of the other person in addition to being ajhaf on the right is my toy to throw the wrong audience and other گرفتاریهای.
If there is a second post worth sharing, you can send a written address to your friends. If you want to have something from my writing blog address can I take along with it to send the reader to refer to the original post.
Any translation of this entry without being familiar with the religious beliefs of Dr. Maleki, former University of Tehran, I presented to him, I have.
The narrative after the US nuclear attack on Hiroshima and, where the whole town to rubble from the ruins had become; a man sweeping the street took up the broom. When asked what place in this sweeping debris mass? Start of lump sum replied that we should!
Recent image saw it recall that Dr. civil I story. I think the doctor has already started civil lump sum!
The original video credit goes to Jonathan Pararajasingham at http://drjtp.com.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues of ecological and humanitarian significance. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this video is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/
PI wrote
This page was removed from the server and the older version was replaced. The latest version of Google Cache, on December 3, 2020, From here Available.
Section: 
Tags: 
ShowIs it possible that the universe created itself, let's just do this is possible from a drop of blood of a man to come there could come to all this کاءینات there is a question of what I made of you …….. Anything that دنیاد to the eye it is made visible to someone how is it possible that all this کاءینات it's all seas Ocean Blue all the birds there وخشکه وحیوانات sections :
ShowScientific theories of evolution, the big bang, and all of these are worth with us less than the hypothesis of being made of flowers?
Show"The human being made of flowers» religious belief is not a hypothesis.
The hypothesis is scientific speculation; that is, based on what we know and what applies proven, it raised new speculation that the book should be checked to confirm or reject methodical; if they confirm the scientific theory, and if they are rejected are the Castaway. If the revocation was not available in the tools it can be deferred to future tests and if the revocable (falsifiable) They also basically not hypothesis.
Proposition or claim to come from the "golden flowers", because the material is revocable and methodical material in the world, because the tools to verify the protocols or where there is true; the hypothesis because it has no scientific basis and Foundation of the faith and has been proven to fail is because khlafsh.
ShowMan of the world, and that made the article how to create an own goal and even if there is not proof of the existence of God is not . This claim is a logical fallacy called a false دوالحدین.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
ShowTo believe in the existence or absence of God, no scientific or evidence or any trial is accountable for your questions.. It only depends on the understanding of thoughtful humans.. However, in my opinion, the denial of God, like my own, I deny you to say, I myself have made my mother's womb and evolved, or that says people Incan we are children of the sun, or anything. And that says 《 you, even if the world is built, do not cause god 》 And I have to say that your opinion is completely non-منطقیه. I'm going to create a car that we now have, without getting to the hands of someone gradually.. Or a more vivid example of the not that you do not turn into any plant, so that one should get a grown-up to grow up but that plant cannot understand and realize you.. Because the world of plants is different.
ShowIf you are not accountable to any scientific, evidence and trial, then what are the mastermind people to understand? How coordinated the perception of "mastermind people" is not based on testing, science, or evidence. How can thinking and perceptual be considered valid but not on the basis of any reasons?
Your opinion is not important because we are talking about your intentions. Objective/Objective issues such as the emergence of people from the mother's womb or the evolution of issues related to the world are material and their authenticity with evidence and testing is proved. The opinion of people is related to the subjects.
My article I wrote for another user (I guess this post or post "Irdat" Mulla Sadra) Was that if we assume the world before the Big Bang, this is not necessarily the cause of God, while this assumption is a big assumption that before the Big Bang was not the time to be causation.. This type of curative deduction is fake. If we say because we do not know anything, then it is not necessarily God, then the "God of the holes" because they don't do something we can't get the desired result..
About the genesis of creatures is a different situation. We are certainly aware of the complexity of the evolution and the natural selection arise (Objective/Objective) That does not require smart creation..
Here's how I explained:
https://farda.us/?p=4743
Show((Nsan article and made the world how come there and even if there is proof of God an not yet created))
ShowSo what is the proof? If this world was a وافریننده God, what's wrong? that can't be seen? if you consider to be seen to be God's name on it? what is seen is limited and restricted to years. in principle, unless the infinite can be seen? Though the world out there with all the surprises that make you کورتان eyes closed, more deliberate, is a logical fallacy of accident or product? It turns out that the laws of physics could not be hawking the agent of creation, who has status? no way unless if you do not have to maintain healthy reason intelligent design that we call God or Allah, it is believed that this is your problem; if you have to believe in God must be دینش Accept, apply to be a decent ومقید and dirt out of the air and working hands ohazar ohos exceed drag that does not accept nfstan the same گوئید not a first that. don't have then tell b. from the perspective of Yes you are not God, not religious, and not قیامتی السبیل هدیناه of Enna Allah said. but شاکراو But God's way کفورا. has shown now, whether of faith اورید okhoah Pagan God ایمانتان not to نیازدارد. and not of profanity and foul play so much stupidity top. you will find someone who all this affection, and even her mother's breast milk at birth you did this, but too bad that hungry ….
You have a paragraph reading after I make mistakes and show yourself mghaltatt and other readers to judge a couple of significant objectionable!
How world wide discussions emerged the philosophical and historical, and each of the solutions that will be presenting multiple errors, and including the existence of God. A piece that I wrote for my transition was restrict high کزدن aomel of the world to the emergence of two types of spontaneous or intelligent design is a fallacy called false care dilemma. May not be intelligent design plan at work and in the world at the time of the place where the head is not likely in the third or fourth or دهمی in the work that we do not know and can know the future, or fail and not. In any case if the issue is not that you are necessarily as you raised. Even though some of what religion claims is our recognition of kharah; but there is also the part that is recognizable and is Castaway. For example, as I wrote above, we can know and we know that the first man not there because it is contrary to the concept of God and the genesis of the world we shnakhtsh tool.
This is a case of the violation of all ادیات Ebrahimi and all three rituals; the revolution fail because we shall all مدعای what God we reject raised solely annulment of one of the components means that the religion of God; not unless God taamada this derghgo fucking We're.
About the genesis of the world and the cause of the first cause, the first does not necessarily have to happen at a time when disabled before that if the first cause and pocketed other disabled herself actually becomes. Disabled because the time Is. Since we know today with the new physics of time have a beginning and the beginning of the big bang it was this God cannot be happen before پیایش time because the violation of the rule of physics is. As I wrote it is not simply that you thought to yourself!
This is a list of the logical fallacy called the fallacies «Bully»! Being a phenomenon must be proved, does not necessarily mean not really seen. A phenomenon shall be revocable ماهیتا (falsifiable)To be proven. God is not revocable so this book will not be methodical athbatsh. The proof of the supernatural phenomena such as the cause and is in need of malulat Falsifiability. The existence of God is not a thing wrong with that, but to prove it's not incredible flexibility.
If the purpose of intelligent design is the creation of intelligent creatures, this issue was rejected, and without a doubt we know the creatures came in effect creates a natural choice. I wrote a detailed post here:
https://farda.us/?p=4743
The resources of each part of it also come with. That has the effect of natural selection on the creatures came to the category is not revocable–That is, the shnakhtsh tool. Another claim is that the globe (Not merely the creatures) Need to have a smart designer (Fine-tunning) That this claim is pseudoscience, and has been a Castaway. None of these are meant to be a lack of proof of God or not God but was not necessary, the existence of God in Genesis universe creatures and reject.
The second entry that "article-oriented» (The same material-oriented "ماتریالیست"» (Bound to material life or مادیات) Offline. Article-oriented or ماتریالیست i.e. someone who believes everything including human consciousness resulting from the interactions in the world article. This does not mean that the article is either or or consciousness thinking is material properties. I'm a متریالیست–That is, looking for physical reasons for coming to the world I'm describing the events related to the article — but I'm also a materialistic-oriented.
They equate a fallacy is called Equivocation That two things are the same in identical name assumes. But if the assumption is that the basic premise of material things is not necessarily to materialism leads, then with another fallacy of the head and you work in the name of Fallacy کامپوزیشن.
What has emerged from something else does not mean maintaining the same properties and features, the world is made of matter but I'm not a material-oriented, vice-versa, a very, pro-semantic, but an atom with yours.!
In order to understand the importance of my difference and understand that this discussion is far beyond faith or lack of faith in supernatural beings for you, I am an example.:
Three hundred years ago the Afghans attacked Esfahan, and King Sultan Hussein instead of defending the conventional military methods, the pea votive ash, and on every pea, called "Lagali Allah".. Shah Sultan Husayn to material practices to solve the material problems and did not believe from the depths of the heart believed that what makes the solution to deal with enemy forces is. The result of the battle at the same time on s!.
Today before you write your response I read a story That the Friday Imam Mashhad, the science of Hoda believes that the Palestinian conflict with Israel is not military equations, but the God's methods.. Mr. Hoda is deeply believed to be a heart. Mr. Alam Abolhoda has the capacity to make a nation blackberry exactly when King Sultan Hussain sent!
When you become a matter of understanding the issues of the material world, the metaphysics reasons of the deep heart of the row, then this is not merely a metaphysics, and it will not be anywhere else!
This is a fallacy is called Adham اتک Or personal attacks.
Instead of proving the claim or breach of my claim, it is very quick to conclude that all of the air, desire, زشتکاری, and moral and aggression are "a wash," Isolation my claim is violated, and your our is proving that these are Not. To prove a claim to claim the correctness of the reason, not the authenticity of the speaker and vice versa.
To inform you, those who are in the filth are the ones who owe the biggest advances of human history.. One hundred and fifty years ago, more than 95 percent of the world's population in absolute poverty were those that you shit you are accused of something that if you were not همانهایی now you خوردید filth and wretchedness dip. On the other hand, the last hundred and fifty years have fought only in Iran for all MESADQ civility of bathing and showering and getting a prep and plumbing water with the mullahs.. All dates are full of tyranny religionists of profit and unشعوری on the human community..
Religionists — What's in other societies — a distinctive moral record that is very bad. It is not زشتکاری that the religionists of its origin is not. They have increased their size for abuse.. The Laamazham and secularists of moral records are not darker than religionists, although I do not believe that religion is not necessarily the meaning of morality.
همانطور که استیون واینبرگ، برنده نوبل فیزیک، می گوید:
ShowThe question whether science could tell that what happened before the big bang to the big bang caused??
The second issue is whether the big bang theory is not totally unproven cosmic dark matter or a fixed argument is in violation of the big bang theory. However, because the big bang could give answers to many questions as a true theory is raised.
This is the story between the scientific thinkers is that if all the theoretical knowledge of chemistry and quantum and فزیک and … Gather together there before the big bang that likely got guess.
ShowBut we have to find the answer, we must refer to the philosophy and religion . The philosophy is to prove the existence of God, but the original answer here is a hand.
I suppose a question Ken's a labor in a soft کارخونه works according to this legal terms for you what it take into consideration if we want true act we need a psychologist and a sociologist, Economist, and… To do this, we invite that هرکی give me a suggestion of one sociologist says, growing social norm of 5 million, the Economist says if you drink 5 million salary and the price you can not save to 12 thousand and says 2 million, a family counselor says this person with regard to mental And the family of 4 person says a 3 and theoretical هرکی toman. . Finally an interdisciplinary person that almost 3 out of every set of indicators in this field, the head of 2.5 million you passed.
Now the discussion is, we should not only with a tool like the universe of science we look at it. Science alone is not the issue and answer with regard to the issue of evaluating her vision got.. The result is that there is an error because I couldn't take the reliable subscription is تجربیه. However, other scientific theories that were flawed or were also to review other people's defects were completed or were by the.
The last point is that religion has been all the time dedicated to the concept of energy with the 21st century scientific assumptions made to explain the article we discuss the bit got ahead without comment after a bit the flesh without math and physics and solve issues on the basis of that and the answer "but bit without badeh? Are there any two-dimensional object . In terms of some of the world's scientists is a computer game that we have to be there to say we think the computer coding of the world is not real, but.
In terms of some other scientists we dont do there we feel that we are there because the sight is not part of the senses, and the senses are also خطاپذیره. However, the argument for an issue, but we should not unilaterally decide to look at the case and.
This is a fallacy is called The god of holes. (God of the gaps)
First, before the Big Bang or the Big Bang, there was no time for anything to happen.. It takes time for an event and time after the Big Bang..
Second، the Big Bang is a scientific theory.. In science, the greatest ancestor of certainty is the greatest certainty and the Big Bang is a framework for understanding the universe..
Philosophy and religion are not at the same level of dogma.. Religion is a method of showing that although it does not prove anything, it does not prove anything, but it shows the depth of knowledge, but religion means accepting any belief from the stomach.. There is no limit to accepting religious nonsense, and because it is not methodical, almost every nonsense and nonsense can be accepted as a religion, and this has always been the case throughout history..
This example means you don't understand what you're talking about.!
If three branches of science come to the same question with three contradictory answers, then you are not dealing with science; you are dealing with science doubts or pseudoscience or scientific nonsense.!
Either the study of a subject is or is not in the circle of the scientific method; if there is or is it possible to arrive at the exact answer to a question in the material world; if there is then the answer under the same conditions must be the same; it must also be observable, measurable and falsifiable.. A material phenomenon may have different dimensions، but the study of each phenomenon is in a given area.. If the scientific method comes to three different answers to the same question, then there is necessarily a problem with methods and measurements, and as I have written, it cannot be scientific..
Like I said, there's a "god of holes.".
No scientific theory (scientific theory) Cannot be violated. The word theory in science is not the same as its everyday usage.. If something is a scientific theory It's at the highest level of certainty. And not everything is a scientific theory.. Some sub-components of theories may become more complete over time, but the theory cannot be ruled out because it must be proven to be theoretical..
Or do you not know what is the matter with you? Or do you think that I do not know who is the learned?"!
ShowString theory was rejected at one point in time..
ShowScientific Theory Can't be rejected If rejected, it is not scientific theory.. Theory is a generality that has been tested over and over again and has been proven to be true.. Not all theories are in a degree of dogma. To measure the dogma of theories, they use a tool called criteria of adequacy equivalent to "correct criteria", which is out of the question, but the general theory of knowledge is not rejected..
About String Theory I translated a Pop Science documentary a few years ago that It's visible from here. Is.
The example you give is an example of an equivocation fallacy that assumes two or more similar things in the name, which are not necessarily equal.. Several assumptions with this name have been emphasized by string theory that are not theories and have been rejected.. This is even the subject of a number of yellow and popular articles called string theory, but as far as physics or any branch of natural sciences is concerned, if something is accepted as theory, it cannot be rejected by one or more experiments.. It may be merged later in a larger framework that gives a better explanation of the material world, but it is not rejected..
ShowDr. . What is your definition of time? Definition of high school physics mirror : Time is a quantity. A man who was a human being.. The time in itself is not external because we have created time for measuring and calculating the physics. There is not a parametric time that is already present and begins with the Big Bang. Second, what caused the Big Bang? 3. How do you think about religion? So just with empirical science، we have to broaden our whole perspective؟ Religion is a category that answers a lot of human questions, and I don't deny that it has been used in every nonsense, but we have science, we have reason. . Professor Chegini PhD in Plasma Physics is the father of plasma physics and a highly religious person. Dr. Golshani and many scientists who are experts in science and have a religious perspective. Humans need metaphysics at all. How can you say that؟ About your scientific ghost issue.: Do you think that all three experts should be referring to the same amount? It's so funny. . Science now has an omnomut of subsets and branches that every branch has its own thing to say.. What Your Excellency says science has to come to a conclusion, otherwise it'll be a scientific specter.. That's true, but there's a story that everyone's commenting on the amount according to their own point of view.. It doesn't take into account other aspects because the science of the branch branch is that interdisciplinary discussion comes up.. What you wrote is extremely simplistic.. There are also scientific theories that have been rejected. . String theory was rejected at some point and re-accepted. The theory of its name implies that it can be rejected if the reasons are scientific and justified.. In the meantime, according to the Big Bang theory, we all believe that the black hole clouds were created in moon when the explosion occurred. . Now the question is, what's causing the world not to regroup at one point due to gravity? Or in other words, preserve the world? That's where the constant cosmic argument or dark matter comes in, and dark matter itself is a flaw in the Big Bang theory.. But as you pointed out, the Big Bang has helped the world to know a lot, the reasons for proving it is more than the reasons for its rejection, my dear Mohsen Sharifpour, an Iranian scientist has proved that the Big Bang was not the beginning of the world, this proof shocked the world.. This is a very short idea that I base my life on this theory and based on it. . But the story is that scientists, apart from being scientific truth, seek to base scientific theories on their own.. What was the dispute between Einstein and Bohr؟ They didn't have trouble coming up with the conclusions. They had trouble coming up with theories. . When Darwin's theory was supposed to enter Russian academic textbooks, Russian scientists refused to let it get into their textbooks, Newton believed God created a place and then put space time in it, telling the story that the person was God-centered and told science according to his beliefs.. That's what you say, Doctor..
ShowI don't yet have a defense-based encyclopedia in one of the science branches so that my doctor is not talking about this moment.. In this website, I did not use the title of "Farhad" or "admin" until today, after the doctoral, if the need was directly addressed, the same admin or Farhad continues to be. Happy academic titles order produced by the mullahs!
I am not نعریفی of time! Your question is similar to how we ask someone: "In your opinion is Paris the capital of France, or Bulgaria?" It is evident that the geography of Paris is not an abstract and a matter of objectivity, and it is not important to our opinion.. If anyone is going to know that Paris is the capital of Bulgaria, it is not necessarily a bad thing.. To know where Paris is, there are some methods that are known to be beyond people..
The time is not a matter of abstract, which is subject to my definition.. The next time is fourth of the matter and is a measurable, visible, and independent category that is related to the material world and therefore this study is in the field of science. How long do we know when we have started with big explosions or the Big bang, isolation your opinion is irrelevant.. Starting time is a physical category, the new physics also has its own identification methods, and the knowledge of physics also says that the time before the explosion was not great.
Don't know! But because we don't means answer, you can be a pair of feet and a religious factor.! As I said, this is a name called "God of the holes.".
In the case of the material world, only experimental sciences are eligible to examine subjects; about the world of transmaterial–If we have to do so,–I am not a means of understanding the metaphysics of wisdom like intuition for recognition. These same empirical sciences have shown that human beings, as mystical or supernatural scenarios, actually have natural roots and are not supernatural or immaterial.. I'll probably write something later..
Generally, the highest levels of scientists in the world are atheists.. Evidence suggests that the more elite scientists are, the more atheists they may be.. I've already linked a few places on this website where more than 90 percent of major scientists are atheists.. But what scientists think doesn't necessarily mean the existence or absence of God.. If we claim to be a fallacy called appeal to authority in Persian, it is something equivalent to "resorting to the parents of affairs", which is a logical fallacy..
If we assume that human beings need something, it doesn't mean it'. Bertrand Russell shows very well that a proposition is correct simply because it is proven to be true, that it is beneficial.–Assuming it is–It's necessarily irrelevant..
Science has no branches and every branch of the natural sciences studies a part of the material world. Science is not a view. The view is a subjugative subject: objectivity and objective science is revocable. It's not a science expert's view, it's that person's perception of science that might be incorrect.
Scientific theory cannot be rejected. I'm not here with you, and I don't have free time.. I'm just passing what I know, just because I believe that clean methods of misfor'a should be available to everyone.. The rest is with you.! I wrote in response once and I don't argue again..
It's crap.!
ShowSir، you haven't actually been kind enough to answer me so late at night.. A person who makes public comments should also rub it on himself. . In the meantime, I have not made up anything of this I have said all the words of the experts in physics.About Mr. Sharifpour interesting that you have not read the article you have not read his scientific article and what the experts said . And you're turning it down. It's very interesting..
ShowI made the most of the comments you made..
ShowYour vision is clear to me.
Overall, 70% of the Nobel Prize winners have been theistic and especially Christian for 100 years.. Those statistics that are mostly atheists are from the National Academy of Sciences، not the Nobel Prize.. It is best to avoid incorrect statistics in expressing your opinion.( Refer to Wikipedia).
ShowCreation is all god's punishment of the heart
ShowHe has no heart that does not confess to God.
Thanks……. :
The Divine Command of the Devil is the Devil's Command to Prostrate to Adam and Satan and to Cast Satan out of the Divine Presence and in another chapter of the Qur'an, Satan will come and deceive Adam and the weather. And they eat of the fruit of the forbidden tree, …Now the question is, how does Satan who has been expelled and outcast, enter God's doorstep without God's permission, and smuggle the mind of man and air without God's permission? Or to split the Red Sea by Moses to reach the land of Israel and Mount Sinai. .. How did Moses come to the sea? 400 The kilometer is split. / Or the moon being ripped apart by Muhammad with a gesture of distance. 384 1،000 kilometers from the moon to the Earth without being seen and recorded or confirmed by other civilizations in the world، my compatriots I know that they have ruined our lives with these superstitions، I want to see a video about schizophrenia and the Prophet's Brain Syndrome on YouTube and you should watch the interviews of schizophrenia patients with severe auditory and visual hallucinations، and my theory for all Abrahamic religions. This is that in Abraham's time, he was diagnosed with schizophrenia and people of that time did not have much knowledge and understanding because of their primitive lifestyle, and they took advantage of this and grew rich over time, and with the increasing power of this family or the group of imposters of their children and descendants anywhere in the world who saw the situation as a good fit, their next plan was to implement a new religion. And if the comments under the video show people who have delusional schizophrenia in the century... 21 You will find that people today are in ignorance. .. Honest words can only be fought by science. .. Again, thanks to Mr. Farhad. ..
Show