BBC

From the time of confrontation with world powers over the nuclear program and Iran's increasing regional influence, the subject of analysis and support together with the same goal of ethnicism embargo — That is, create instability and chaos in the country and the nuclear program امتیازگیری — بطور گسترده در دستور کار کشورهای طرف مواجه با ایران قرار گرفت و ردیف بودجه ای محرمانه در داخل سازمان سیا برای آن تخصیص داده شد.^I This program is targeted by the United States, Israel and the UK countries follow; however, based on the Wikileaks site documents, in addition to the intelligence organizations of the three countries, the smaller countries like Pakistan are active in this field; in the case of Pakistan, according to the cooperation with Wikileaks reveal The British intelligence organization Mossad and the support of the country's reformists, the end.^II

In the year 2007 to the lomond case, in addition to the direct support of CIA analyzing Iran's reformists, also spend millions of dollars creating groups with the title defenders and human rights activists in Iran and outside Iran does. این موضوع بعدا در سال 2009 توسط آقای نیکولاس برنز، معاون وزیر امورخارجه وقت آمریکا، رسما تایید شد.^III The task of these groups is a political activity and secession in the name and under the defense of human rights in Iran. Many of these later communications with activists close and friendly with the political opposition known characters and influence in different political groups — Some even nationalist — Could your قومگرایانه activities to pursue more effective face.

The next time the media in countries with wide possibilities of analysis in their support of Iranian reformists. According to the lomond and based on documents disclosed in the report of the Congress and the US Senate, the CIA numerous media and a huge media campaign for the publication of false information and دروغپراکنی, through America and Europe and with some Iranian figures outside Iran, procurement visibility.^IV The alien media today with our extensive facilities in the judgment of the double-edged sword for Iranians are that on one hand, in terms of internal suffocation and censorship, only effective speaker of Iranian society are considered to be, and on the other hand with respect to the existence of a media monopoly and extreme dependence on the people, the way For their respective countries political advertising provide you with. The BBC is one of the media that plays an important role in recent years — What is political and what is propaganda-mongering lies — Those responsible for the.

Exponential upside-down truth and analysis of purification and terrorists that are criminal, but as a human rights activist or ideological and political prisoners, is one of the services that the BBC has done over the years.^V In addition to this the BBC alternatively via your website, video and media content as picked in support of analysis and publishes their ethnicism. Despite being these articles each in separate categories and topics, are all of a field and the main theme of the national oppression in the name of "conceptual". The posts regardless of whether by personal and what's what with written records and سلایقی regardless of what استنتاجاتی in the subject of that article raised, unit this message to the audience that in Iran, an ethnic group called the "fares" that are to The different forms of political, cultural and linguistic rights, shadowed, other ethnic groups about the infringement and inducing the production of this illusion, and that the roots of نابسمانی are وگرفتاریهای different areas of Iran's people, in fact, the same ethnic group of Fars is. This way the ads of the World War II era repeatedly tested, the same way that all modern devices of publicity based on the political and economic act — That is, a single message in the form of the symbols and shapes and they repeated in various ways. With this method, especially in the media, such as television and multi-sensory effect on continuous repeat a message, a contact on the length of time the message vulnerability.

Shorbaktane should accept this truth, as long as the political system of Iran govern the legal liberties — That people often enjoy it from countries around the world — And the right of access to a free flow of news and information for the people of Iran, to recognize foreign media can be of current media monopoly abuse and our national interests still pamal incapability of alien countries seeking more Government and ourselves will be up to the task of dealing with this time it شرای National identity and protecting environment and historical heritage is on the shoulders of the Iranian ایراندوستان.

1. Funding for their separatist causes comes directly from the CIA’s classified budget but is now “no great secret”, according to one former high-ranking CIA official in Washington who spoke anonymously to The Sunday Telegraph.

   His claims were backed by Fred Burton, a former US state department counter-terrorism agent, who said: “The latest attacks inside Iran fall in line with US efforts to supply and train Iran’s ethnic minorities to destabilise the Iranian regime.” [+], [+]

   [↪]

2. British and US intelligence have resented the Pakistani-Iranian
   intelligence cooperation against Jondollah in Pakistani Balochistan. As
   for the reason behind such a change in Pakistan’s position towards Iran,
   it is attributed to the discovery of a joint UK-US-Indian intelligence
   plan in cooperation with the Mosad that supports separatist movements in
   Pakistan. Foremost among these movements is the Baloch rebel movement
   through the Balochistan Liberation Army. British intelligence plays a
   major role in this plan in cooperation with Indian intelligence. When
   Pakistan was accused of supporting terrorism in India, it responded by
   providing several documents that show Indian intelligence’s involvement
   in supporting Pakistani separatist movements in Balochistan,
   Khyber-Paktunkhwa, and the Pakistani tribal area.

   Pakistani Prime Minister Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani handed the documents to
   Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh when he met with him i n Sharm
   al-Shaykh on 16 July 2009. This was through undeclared Egyptian
   mediation. Pakistan objects to the British and US plans on Iran and the
   support provided for Jondollah in order to separate the Iranian
   Baluchestan Province. This is because it believes that the success of
   such a plan will mean losing the strategic Pakistani Balochistan
   Province and its enormous natural resources. [+], [+]

   [↪]

3. Besides supporting separatists, a report in Le Monde Diplomatique revealed that millions of U.S. dollars are covertly administered to NGO human rights activists in Iran (Harrison 2007). These revelations are confirmed by former U.S. Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns (Fotopoulos 2009). [+], [+]

   [↪]

4. Besides expanded propaganda broadcasts, a media disinformation campaign and the use of US and European-based Iranian exiles to promote political dissent, the programme focuses on economic warfare, especially currency rate manipulation and the disruption of Iran’s international banking and trade. Although the finding was nominally secret, it did not stay secret for long after it was reported to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees, as required by law. [+], [+]

   [↪]

5. Two individuals (Adnan Hassanpour and Abdolvahed “Hiva” Botimar) from
   a well-known Kurdish armed separatist group (Pejak), similar to PKK in
   Turkey, are sentenced to death in Iran, and just because they have
   apparently written a few articles in a tiny local newspaper.

   Saleh Nikbakht has told a Kurdish
   newspaper. He has also added that none of these two men are charged
   for their civil or journalistic activities. None are heroes and the
   people who want to make them look like a martyr have a political
   agenda.

   Then the whole false story appears on the
   front page of the BBC news and everyone starts talking as if Iran is
   going to execute two innocent young men because of their writings. [+]

   [↪]