"Is there a God?" Steven Hawking
Hello dear friend. تقسیم بندی قلمرو علم و فلسفه از من نیست از ارسطو است؛ اما در دوران مدرن هم کاربرد دارد. برای مثال این کتاب چاپ دانشگاه ایالتی نیویورک را ببینید.

Traditionally, doxa has been defined as the domain of probable knowledge and contrasted to episteme, the realm of certainty. Ricoeur takes Aristotel’s position on the distinction between probability and certainty, and like him, insists that “rather than denounce doxa (opinions) as inferior to episteme (science), philosophy can consider elaborating a theory of the probable.

About Islamic philosophy and West philosophy unlike the Eastern philosophy that basically everything is an independent, Islamic philosophy is taken from the اجزایش of Western philosophy. Although I also agree with you that the new creature is made of the independent identity but about my said here And here You can see the.

About the classification of براهین me something nnoshtem. What I see there only as long as the content is said to me, no matter. I have a philosophy in the University and in the United States sang and phrases that I use here of the English language I English I translation. You have to Logical Argument Any معادلی that you prefer, you can use the English. I don't know what I — Of course, I'm already deep in the philosophy of consciousness — Does not solve your problem.

In the case of argument from anslm and Descartes is merely on the size of you write that both arguments are reasonable, bugs. The argument Descartes is valid(Valid) But spotless (Sound) Offline. Because mfrwadatsh is false and this gave her the next time the philosophers like Kant should write a separate entry in that story but About Ibn Sina Previously I wrote a story. Please keep out of the wrong per this post written under the same you. Comment this post is written solely about the same topic.

"Is there a God?" Steven Hawking
Hello dear friend, there is no reason that I do I delete comments you. So when a duplicate comments will not be removed and cultured.. As I wrote I merely know the philosophy of the alphabet and I'm not a specialist in this field, but as far as I know the Islamic philosophy also is part of the Western philosophy. Western religions are also religions Ebrahimi. Anything that goes West is a document in categories of philosophy and ancient Western religions can be considered,. The Eastern and Western talk of being here is not a huge difference between today's academic philosophy and Islamic philosophy relating to the middle ages which is pristine and untouched, there a few hundred years that remained in Iran. There is a difference so that this does not mean that the West, or the philosophy of the contemporary Islamic philosophy and because these two things are separate from the.

To prove the existence of God, there are three types of argument: Despite being برهانهای (ontological arguments) In the future, possibly in that story I write a separate entry. برهانهای related to the cause of the universe (cosmological arguments) Such as the صدیقین argument Avicenna that you mentioned that Plato or براهینی and azesto about the cause of the first برهانهایی and the provision to the regulations of the world (teleological arguments). The number is براهین. But none of this was not fully accepted until today براهین. In other words, all of this has been compiled during the time of brhanha there including the same argument there is that other people raised صدیقین. About this argument definitely opportunities like Avicenna wrote.

But as برهانهایی about the existence of God in برهانهایی; also raised the existence of God in the same Wikipedia link so that a list of these is available brhanha.
Org/wiki wikipedia fa../category:The argument _ proof _ not _ of God

This is like the first group براهین براهین by a number of approved and rejected by a number of other. Generally, there is no rational reason and was accepted in the logical or of God until today there are no. The belief in the existence of God or not is more a matter of emotional and rational and logical rather than religious..

"Is there a God?" Steven Hawking
My dear friend your read more. You do not know the existence of God is logically براهین. As soon as the scientific discussion in astdlaltan name the leftist philosophy and the word means the difference of science and philosophy of the time you don't know. About the existence of God in برهانهای there is a logical and historical استدلالهای brhanha it come together. No it is not wrong that we are not to know something I did in many of these cases like you not aware. But we can put these issues in the writings of others have referred to, and awareness of others is not to study in the same field are not charged. I probably will soon write a story I write.

The BBC's response to the Iranian people is race;
Dear friend you can say Perth and Pola. You can expect the Lockman and others also benefit from this knowledge لایزالت. You thought I was a couple of times this week take nonsense? Sumerian language in terms of a group of isolated, are valid in any University in the world, this group's ancestors of the Turks or no other ethnic group are not considered. http://azargoshnasp.net/recent_history/pan_turkist_philosophy/sumd/buqalamoonsumeri.htm

In the case of my three posts on this blog Aryan wrote does not need to explain more. If someone wants to learn what can be written to look for sources if someone will have something to learn from me not working. The race also A social system And the base is not genetic. Something called the European race or don't race, Aryan race.. Why is there the same apparent features a detailed explanation of the needs that I wrote a post later maybe but something called race for the modern man does not have the application categories. In the case of the BBC also denied entry to nkhstshan themselves, and the second entry is the same as my written claim confirmed means that Iranians are survivors of the آریاییان living in Plateau. You will not post the rational نخواندی and after.

Rafsanjani: The decomposition of Azerbaijan and Baluchistan after the elections
1)Those who have today called Sadat know it have nothing to do with the Arab-Arabian peninsula. Even other bands today termed Arab like Iraq or Lebanon except the line and people with Arabs than do other. 2)Sidi in Iran is a full business income was and still is. Many in the past century claim their next generations and Sidi Sayed were called. Only twenty million SM there is in India that they are descendants of Ali. 3)There is something called the Aryan race or there is Arab. From the tags on the label of the Aryan race, and a few items that I see in that story I wrote. 4)Mossadegh was leaving Ghajar but ajdadsh Lor ashtiani were. The Qajar tribe is though a Turkish tribe, but it was with the size of the Iranian groups overhear that cannot be it a group called in Turkish. About the arrival of the Mughals and other guys so its shape size in other groups were مستحیل, which today is a sign of them not found.

The Charter of Cyrus and the adventure of stealing gheyas Reza Moradi Abadi
Wherever the source written story also come with. Bounce like General gheyas Abadi likes exaggeration of the problem does not solve. In this post story claimed his newspaper Hamshahri does come together. In the remaining cases it is referred to whenever the alleged gheyas Abadi have been or Be sure the source entries His time has come. If any of you own what's objectionable content and what his friends can be wrong because it's written below it and the room and be sure to be released.
Historical resources related to centuries ago in the hands of the likes of gheyas settlements does not value. Gheyas Abadi is a specialist on the owner of the ریویو several articles and books not academic. It merely can be properly cited recent academic texts to show ادعاهایش. If somewhere in this website in violation of the recent scientific texts to write a story was sure to be released.

Errors in the صدیقین argument Avicenna proving the existence of God
Hello dear friend,
Thank khobtan comments. I think you have two things that are similar to the name of each place you. In English to you Equivocation Say. A collection of facts meant to total (A gathering of) Not numbers. For example, the set of prime numbers or numbers are numbers contain numbers for couples with specific characteristics, but they are not a number. It may be a collection of the properties of its components do not have or do not own the properties of the components but not necessarily. The example in this context is not limited only to the collection of numbers. For example, the major part of my body is composed of water and you. But this does not mean that we have, for example, the properties of water in one hundred degrees Celsius to steam or zero degrees go on ice or wet if we sat down there somewhere. This entry is mainly there that was next to the philosophers Avicenna groups. As I wrote this for my high transition errors from Munich University of philosophy is a podcast and is accessible from here to London کینگزکاج. Be victorious.
historyofphilosophy.net/avicenna-god

Jewish billionaire: The atomic bombing Iran
No I do not shut down. Mercy of the pain and the heart.